1999
DOI: 10.1053/hj.1999.v137.93032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intravascular ultrasound and stent implantation: Intraobserver and interobserver variability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Intra- and interobserver variability were reported previously from our laboratory [9]. Correlation coefficient for intra- and interobserver measurements were 0.96 and 0.93 for proximal and 0.94 and 0.92 for distal reference segments.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Intra- and interobserver variability were reported previously from our laboratory [9]. Correlation coefficient for intra- and interobserver measurements were 0.96 and 0.93 for proximal and 0.94 and 0.92 for distal reference segments.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Due to differences in reflected signals from different tissues, conventional gray-scale IVUS can distinguish normal vessel lumen and vessel wall from atherosclerotic plaque, intraluminal thrombus, and intimal dissection with high sensitivity. 1 Within the atherosclerotic plaque, it can further identify the deposition of lipid (hypoechoic signal) and calcium (hyperechoic signal with distal shadowing). The probe is mounted near the tip of a monorail catheter that tracks over a 0.014-in guidewire (Fig.…”
Section: The Ivus Modality For Neurointerventions: Equipment Techniqmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IVUS measurements have been shown to correlate well with phantom image measurements [19][20][21]. Correlation studies must, however, be supplemented by Bland-Altman analysis, as the clinical relevance of a correlation coefficient is hard to determine and systematic errors are not picked up [22].…”
Section: Ivus Measurement Reproducibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%