1985
DOI: 10.1515/jpme.1985.13.4.171
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR) in pre-term infants

Abstract: Intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR) in pre-term infants 13(1985) 171

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0
7

Year Published

1987
1987
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(16 reference statements)
1
31
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the present data suggest that restricted intrauterine growth (IUGR) deserves further investigation as a possible risk factor of BPD. The unfavourable effects of IUGR on neonatal wellbeing [20,21] and on the developmental prospects [22,24] of preterm infants have also been recently established.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the present data suggest that restricted intrauterine growth (IUGR) deserves further investigation as a possible risk factor of BPD. The unfavourable effects of IUGR on neonatal wellbeing [20,21] and on the developmental prospects [22,24] of preterm infants have also been recently established.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1977, two cohorts of prematurely born children of the same age (N = 209, gestational age -< 36 weeks) were formed to assess the effects of IUGR on morbidity, mortality, growth and neurological development. The children had been born and were treated in Kuopio University Central Hospital, which is a regional centre for neonatal intensive care in the province of Kuopio, in Finland, Early morbidity and mortality in relation to prematurity and intrauterine growth status in these cohorts has previously been reported [13]. Members of the cohorts were prospectively followed-up in the neonatal out-patient clinic.…”
Section: Study Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…"Normal" values for growth parameters were defined as values within 2 SD of the mean for the gestational age. "Low" was defined as a value more than 2 SD below the expected mean for the gestational age [13]. 2) Freedom from any malformation or major neurological handicaps (cerebral palsy).…”
Section: Study Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations