2015
DOI: 10.7860/jcdr/2015/13967.6333
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intrauterine Fetal Death in Gunshot Injury to the Gravid Uterus: Forensic Perspective

Abstract: A 38-week-pregnant woman was brought to the emergency of PGIMER, Chandigarh with history of gunshot injury to abdomen with Intra-uterine fetal death. She underwent surgical intervention within two hours of the incident.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(15 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…56 Table 1 demonstrates the results of the appraisal, finding all 41 studies to be detailed enough to be replicated, relevant to contemporary practice, and demonstrate adequately ascertained exposure (GSW) and coprimary outcomes (maternal and/or neonatal death). While 82% (34/41) of studies had adequate follow-up of surviving patient(s) until or beyond discharge, [4][5][6][7][8][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][23][24][25][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][38][39][40][41][42][43][44] few studies (6/41) with a clear selection method were limited to the case series and small registries in this review. 5,6,11,16,41,43 In the GRADE 57 assessment of our review based on observational studies, our certainty of evidence was downgraded due to risk of selection bias and upgraded as possible confounders not discussed in the studies (comorbidities, obstetric history, socioeconomic status, degree of education, global variation in standards of care, etc.)…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…56 Table 1 demonstrates the results of the appraisal, finding all 41 studies to be detailed enough to be replicated, relevant to contemporary practice, and demonstrate adequately ascertained exposure (GSW) and coprimary outcomes (maternal and/or neonatal death). While 82% (34/41) of studies had adequate follow-up of surviving patient(s) until or beyond discharge, [4][5][6][7][8][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][23][24][25][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][38][39][40][41][42][43][44] few studies (6/41) with a clear selection method were limited to the case series and small registries in this review. 5,6,11,16,41,43 In the GRADE 57 assessment of our review based on observational studies, our certainty of evidence was downgraded due to risk of selection bias and upgraded as possible confounders not discussed in the studies (comorbidities, obstetric history, socioeconomic status, degree of education, global variation in standards of care, etc.)…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…56 Table 1 demonstrates the results of the appraisal, finding all 41 studies to be detailed enough to be replicated, relevant to contemporary practice, and demonstrate adequately ascertained exposure (GSW) and coprimary outcomes (maternal and/or neonatal death). While 82% (34/41) of studies had adequate follow-up of surviving patient(s) until or beyond discharge, 4-8,12-20,23-25,27-36,38-44 few studies (6/41) with a clear selection method were limited to the case series and small registries in this review. 5,6,11,16,41,43…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations