BACKGROUNDThe concept of CSE has come into existence with the aims to provide the benefits of spinal block along with flexibility of an epidural catheter so as to modify and prolong the block for a longer period. CSE can be used to reduce or eliminate the disadvantages of spinal and epidural anaesthesia while preserving their advantages. The CSE technique has been used for orthopaedic and trauma surgery of lower limb, general surgery, urologic surgery, gynaecologic surgery, caesarean section, management of labour pain and postoperative pain. CSE blocks have also been used as research tools for controlled comparison between different epidural and subarachnoid techniques. Furthermore, the technique has been used successfully in all age groups including preterm neonates and infants, the very old and other high-risk patients. CSE is a multicompartment block. CSE involves intentional dural puncture followed by epidural drug administration. This introduces the possibility of drug flux from the epidural to the subarachnoid space, which may alter the characteristics of the block. Subarachnoid pressure is normally regarded as greater than epidural pressure by 5-15 cm H2O. This pressure gradient is an obstacle to drug flux into the subarachnoid space. The epidural pressure rises transiently, but dramatically after drug administration, the similar rise in subarachnoid pressure occurs. There is a brief period during, which epidural pressure may exceed subarachnoid pressure. This produces conditions that would allow drug flux into the subarachnoid space.
MATERIALS AND METHODSThis clinical study was conducted in Department of Anaesthesiology in association with Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology at Victoria General Hospital attached to Andhra Medical College, Visakhapatnam, from October 2013 to August 2014. Clearance was obtained from hospital ethics committee for the study. Written informed consent was obtained from all the patients. 40 parturients with ASA I and ASA II in established labour with cervical dilatation less than 5 cm was selected and randomly allocated into two groups using closed envelope method. Informed written consent was taken from all participants. They were divided into 2 groups of 20 each. Group I received intrathecal Inj. Bupivacaine 1.25 mg and Inj. Fentanyl 20 µg. Group II received intrathecal Inj. Ropivacaine 2.5 mg and Inj. Fentanyl 20 µg for combined spinal epidural. IV line was secured with 18G cannula. Patient was preloaded with 500 mL of Hartmann's solution. Basal vital parameter like pulse rate, blood pressure, respiration, O2 saturation were recorded. The patient was positioned in a sitting position with the help of an assistant. Under aseptic conditions, the back was prepared with 5% povidone-iodine solution, spirit and area was draped. L3-L4 interspace was identified. Skin was infiltrated with 2 mL of 1% Xylocaine. After infiltration of local anaesthetic by using needle through needle technique 18-gauge Tuohy needle, epidural space was identified with loss of resistance to air techniqu...