2014
DOI: 10.5935/0004-2749.20140049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intrastromal crosslinking in post-LASIK ectasia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The one eye was treated with what was termed intrastromal CXL, and ended up asymptomatic with 20/20 acuity and no sign of disease progression on corneal topography after 1 year 28. In contrast to our study, the flap was only opened, and riboflavin was injected between the flap and the stroma bed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The one eye was treated with what was termed intrastromal CXL, and ended up asymptomatic with 20/20 acuity and no sign of disease progression on corneal topography after 1 year 28. In contrast to our study, the flap was only opened, and riboflavin was injected between the flap and the stroma bed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…To our knowledge, the only report similar to this technique for early PLE is the case of a 28-year-old female who presented 4 months post-LASIK with unilateral inferior corneal steepening and decreased visual acuity 28. The one eye was treated with what was termed intrastromal CXL, and ended up asymptomatic with 20/20 acuity and no sign of disease progression on corneal topography after 1 year 28.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ectasia is one of the most common post-LASIK complications. In most cases, crosslinking is considered the gold standard to prevent progression (3) . Severe cases with acute hydrops in post-LASIK ectasia patients are also common (2,4) ; however, to our knowledge, no studies have discussed aqueous leakage in these cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the complication rate is low (0.04%-0.6%), the number of cases reported might be underestimated (2) . The main risk factors include suspected preoperative topographical abnormalities, residual stromal bed <250 µm, preoperative corneal thickness less than normal, and increased myopia (3) . Currently, one of the most important parameters used in preoperative evaluations for LASIK is the percentage of tissue altered (PTA) >40% ([flap thickness + ablation depth]/central corneal thickness) (2) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 Performing CXL under the LASIK flap (flap-CXL) has been proposed to stabilize post-LASIK ectasia. [8][9][10] Instead of corneal debridement as in Standard CXL, the existing flap is reflected, with riboflavin applied directly onto the stromal bed followed by flap repositioning and UVA irradiation. This technique bears similarities to LASIK with simultaneous prophylactic CXL under the flap, which has been purported to potentially reduce the risk of regression or the development of ectasia, 11 but which has uncertain clinical and biomechanical benefit.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%