2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ergon.2007.10.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intraspinal forces and health risk caused by whole-body vibration—Predictions for European drivers and different field conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Experimental studies can support the understanding of the fundamental effects of whole-body vibration on the human body and can deliver data concerning the vibration behaviour of the human body under defined conditions which can be used as basis for modelling [8,13]. In experimental studies, the influence of different postures on the vibration behaviour (apparent mass or impedance) was tested for different sitting conditions, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental studies can support the understanding of the fundamental effects of whole-body vibration on the human body and can deliver data concerning the vibration behaviour of the human body under defined conditions which can be used as basis for modelling [8,13]. In experimental studies, the influence of different postures on the vibration behaviour (apparent mass or impedance) was tested for different sitting conditions, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These data would help identify the risk of injury based on cumulative fatigue failure 11) . Such more realistic dynamic FE models are of great help to determine quantities potentially relevant for the evaluation of vibration behaviour and that are not accessible to direct measurements, e.g., internal loads at different levels of the lumbar spine 11,37) . A few dynamic FE models have been reported in the literature that have overlooked the time-history of muscle forces during the WBV, thus neglecting the effects of dynamic muscle forces on the trunk response.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This FE model was validated based on the apparent mass data from the Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (FIOSH) and partners in the frequency range up to 20 Hz. Seidel et al 11) further developed a set of FE models based on human anatomy to estimate intraspinal forces at all lumbar levels accounting for real exposure conditions. These models were adapted to typical postures of European drivers and their anthropometric parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Matlabprogram identifies the peak compressive forces in the predicted time series and calculates a risk factor according to different typical body postures and lumbar vertebral levels. The model was adapted from five typical operator postures of different types of vehicles (Group 1dforklifts, Group 2dfront loaders, Group 3dexcavators, Group 4dforwarders, Group 5dharvesters) and further incorporates 10 categories of different anthropometric characteristics of European drivers ((Pankoke et al, 2001;Seidel et al, 2008). For a description of vehicles and test conditions see Table 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%