2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7519(01)00319-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intraspecific variation in Radopholus similis isolates assessed with restriction fragment length polymorphism and DNA sequencing of the internal transcribed spacer region of the ribosomal RNA cistron

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
40
0
5

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
4
40
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, classifying strains of the Taiwan isolates on the basis on these parameters is not feasible. The Taiwan isolates are highly aberrant and divergent members of the same species, as described by Elbadri et al (2002) for the parasitic nematode Radopholus similis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, classifying strains of the Taiwan isolates on the basis on these parameters is not feasible. The Taiwan isolates are highly aberrant and divergent members of the same species, as described by Elbadri et al (2002) for the parasitic nematode Radopholus similis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…This means that morphology, i.e. tomont size, does not always support phylogeny based on the rDNA sequence, nor are developmental characteristics always consistent with molecular relationships (Elbadri et al 2002). Hence, as suggested by Thompson & Lymbery (1990), phenotypic variation in some parasites does not always appear to have a genetic basis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Blaxter et al 1998;Bhadury et al 2006a, b;Creer et al 2010) and 28S rRNA genes (e.g. Litvaitis et al 2000;De Ley et al 2005;Pereira et al 2010) as well as internal transcribed spacers (ITS; Hugall et al 1999;Elbadri et al 2002;Félix et al 2014). Here, various studies showed that the D2-D3 region of the 28S rDNA represents one of the most suitable and promising markers for a valid nematode identification, which can be used to delimitate even closely related species (De Ley et al 2005;Pereira et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Türkiye'den elde edilen 29 farklı kök-ur nematodu izolatı arasındaki farklılıklar ve benzerlikler AFLP yöntemi ile ortaya koyulmuştur (Devran et al, 2008). Önemli bitki paraziti nematod türlerini içeren Pratylenchus cinslerinin ayrımında da AFLP yöntemi sıklıkla ve yaygın olarak kullanılmıştır (Waeyenberge et al, 2000;Elbadri et al, 2002).…”
Section: Aflp (Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism)unclassified