1986
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.1986.tb05190.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intraspecific variation in competitive ability and food intake in salmonids: consequences for energy budgets and growth rates

Abstract: The interactions between dominance status, feeding rate and growth in rainbow trout, Salrno gairdneri Richardson, were analyzed using published data on experimental populations. There was a positive correlation between metabolic expenditure and food intake in both dominant and subordinate fish, but dominants obtained a greater intake for a given expenditure than did subordinates. Subordinates that adopted a high-return/high-cost foraging strategy actually expended more energy than they acquired, whereas those … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
162
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 239 publications
(166 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
4
162
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The capacity to process food and grow fast, or maintain a dominant social status endowed by a high SMR (Millidine et al 2009), may be a disadvantage during food shortage (Metcalfe 1986;Burton et al 2011), when these individuals are likely to lose energy reserves faster than low-SMR individuals. Especially for larval fish with high weight-specific metabolic rates and low energy reserves, the interaction between metabolism and environmental conditions could be an important factor determining survival.…”
Section: Otolith Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The capacity to process food and grow fast, or maintain a dominant social status endowed by a high SMR (Millidine et al 2009), may be a disadvantage during food shortage (Metcalfe 1986;Burton et al 2011), when these individuals are likely to lose energy reserves faster than low-SMR individuals. Especially for larval fish with high weight-specific metabolic rates and low energy reserves, the interaction between metabolism and environmental conditions could be an important factor determining survival.…”
Section: Otolith Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these, body size has received considerable attention (Policanksy 1982, Rice et al 1987, Anderson 1988, Pepin 1989, Litvak & Leggett 1992. One hypothesis is that a larger size at a given life history stage confers a survival advantage through reduced predation rates ) and enhanced competitive abilities, hence greater access to food resources (Coates 1980, Metcalfe 1986). In addition, the levels of energy reserves (nutritional condition) in larvae potentially provide a buffer against fluctuations in the pelagic envi.ronment such as food availabi.lity and temperature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An evolutionary game theory model by Enquist and Leimar (1987) predicts that the costs of fighting will increase when resource value increases and, the probability of victory for an animal will increase when resource value is increased only to that animal. Aggressiveness is often shown by dominant individuals in interference competition (Metcalfe, 1986). For instance, in trout, the dominants can aggressively defend a food source and thereby largely reduce feeding and consequently growth of the subordinates (Metcalfe, 1986).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%