1986
DOI: 10.2307/2408473
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intraspecific Sympatry in a "Ring Species," the Plethodontid Salamander Ensatina eschscholtzii, in Southern California

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
72
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(8 reference statements)
1
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Subsequent research has shown that xanthoptica and platensis hybridize wherever they meet, but in very narrow hybrid zones (on the order of several home range diameters in width, or a few hundred meters). While klauberi and eschscholtzii hybridize, they do so less frequently and in even narrower hybrid zones (10,13). At the southernmost area of contact, the two forms are sympatric with no evidence of past or present hybridization (13,14).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequent research has shown that xanthoptica and platensis hybridize wherever they meet, but in very narrow hybrid zones (on the order of several home range diameters in width, or a few hundred meters). While klauberi and eschscholtzii hybridize, they do so less frequently and in even narrower hybrid zones (10,13). At the southernmost area of contact, the two forms are sympatric with no evidence of past or present hybridization (13,14).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2). Levels of interbreeding suggest that reproductive isolation is not nearly so complete in the Sierra Nevada as in the southern contact between eschscholtzii and klauberi, and this mid-ring contact was thus viewed as consistent with the ring species scenario (Wake et al, 1989). In summary, despite the imperfections, Stebbins saw in Ensatina a compelling example of a ring species, as it included divergence along both distributional arms, a midring contact showing that hybridization was still possible, and sympatry of subspecies in southern California (Stebbins, 1949).…”
Section: A Brief Review Of Two Prominent Ring Species Complexesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…pervasive in the mid-ring contact between xanthoptica and eschscholtzii (Brown, 1974;Wake et al, 1989;Alexandrino et al, 2005;Pereira and Wake, 2009) than it is in the terminal contact between klauberi and eschscholtzii (Brown, 1974;Devitt et al, 2011). Both regions of contact involve what would be considered species-level entities by most criteria, except an extreme version of the biological species concept that does not allow for any interbreeding at all.…”
Section: A Brief Review Of Two Prominent Ring Species Complexesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…klauberi) in southern California (Stebbins 1949). Behaving as closely related but distinct species, unblotched eschscholtzii and blotched klauberi are known to hybridize occasionally (Brown 1974, Wake andYanev 1986), and Highton (1998) advocated species-level recognition with hybrid zones for all the infraspecific taxa within Ensatina. However, Wake and Schneider (1998), while ac-USDA Forest Service Gen. Tech.…”
Section: Taxonomymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…klauberi) in southern California (Stebbins 1949). Behaving as closely related but distinct species, unblotched eschscholtzii and blotched klauberi are known to hybridize occasionally (Brown 1974, Wake andYanev 1986), and Highton (1998) advocated species-level recognition with hybrid zones for all the infraspecific taxa within Ensatina. However, Wake and Schneider (1998), while ac-knowledging that the ensatina does not meet all of the criteria for a true ring species, argued against disrupting the long-stable taxonomy of this species complex until further morphological and genetic studies are completed.…”
Section: Taxonomymentioning
confidence: 99%