2023
DOI: 10.1098/rsob.230025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intraspecific genetic variation in host vigour, viral load and disease tolerance during Drosophila C virus infection

Abstract: Genetic variation for resistance and disease tolerance has been described in a range of species. In Drosophila melanogaster , genetic variation in mortality following systemic Drosophila C virus (DCV) infection is driven by large-effect polymorphisms in the restriction factor pastrel (pst) . However, it is unclear if pst contributes to disease tolerance. We investigated systemic DCV challenges spanning nine orders of magnitude, in males an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…High perceived risk of extrinsic mortality (including due to disease) is predicted to select for higher investment in current reproduction (Hirshfield and Tinkle 1975; Corbel and Carazo 2022). Several studies in D. melanogaster have provided evidence that sub-lethal infection with DCV increases productivity (Gupta et al 2017; Kutzer et al 2023). Within the context of our experiment, the lower reproductive output of the high LT50 lines resulted in low relative fitness, despite their longer survival time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High perceived risk of extrinsic mortality (including due to disease) is predicted to select for higher investment in current reproduction (Hirshfield and Tinkle 1975; Corbel and Carazo 2022). Several studies in D. melanogaster have provided evidence that sub-lethal infection with DCV increases productivity (Gupta et al 2017; Kutzer et al 2023). Within the context of our experiment, the lower reproductive output of the high LT50 lines resulted in low relative fitness, despite their longer survival time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ability to avoid contact with pathogens allows healthy individuals to evade the pathology resulting from infection and further prevents the activation of the immune response, which may be metabolically costly or even cause immunopathology, with detrimental effects on host fitness [27][28][29]. Given that individuals vary widely in susceptibility and in the extent to which they experience losses in fitness during infection [30][31][32][33], the potential costs and benefits of avoiding infection are therefore likely to vary between individuals [2,17]. Such variable costs, in turn, may contribute to the maintenance of standing genetic variation in avoidance via fluctuating selection [34][35][36], and affect the predicted evolutionary trajectories of pathogens [37,38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is often substantial variation within species in susceptibility to infection; host genotype often strongly influences susceptibility due to a variety of factors, including variation in cellular immunity and barrier defenses (e.g., Leitão et al 2019, Cáceres andStewart Merrill 2023). Similarly, susceptible host genotypes can vary in their quality for the parasite, with parasites able to produce more infectious propagules in certain host genotypes (e.g., Auld et al 2017, Kutzer et al 2023. Additionally, host genotypes can vary in their sensitivity to changing resource quality, with variation in tolerance of low resource quality, and, conversely, in ability to exploit rich resource environments (e.g., Watt 1986, Hall et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%