2000
DOI: 10.3354/meps195305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intraspecific co-variation between egg and body size affects fertilisation kinetics of free-spawning marine invertebrates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
73
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We know of no other study on decapods that examined maternal influence on sibling size variation. However, Marshall et al (2000) found a similar effect of maternal size on variation in egg size within broods in the ascidian Pyura stolonifera. A recent study on the brown trout Salmo trutta L. found no effect of maternal size on sibling size variation (Gregersen et al 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…We know of no other study on decapods that examined maternal influence on sibling size variation. However, Marshall et al (2000) found a similar effect of maternal size on variation in egg size within broods in the ascidian Pyura stolonifera. A recent study on the brown trout Salmo trutta L. found no effect of maternal size on sibling size variation (Gregersen et al 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…We harvested gametes using standard strip-spawning techniques (67). Briefly, we dissected the gonads from each individual into a Petri dish with a few drops of filtered sea water.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Distinguishing among these alternative explanations is crucial given the importance of larval size to the post-metamorphic performance of individuals. Offspring size often shows wide population level variation, but whether this variation reflects local adaptation of mothers to the local environment or simply reflects nutritional or genetic differences among populations remains unknown (George 1994, 1999, Bertram & Strathmann 1998, Marshall et al 2000. In order to discriminate among these explanations, experimental manipulations of maternal size that are independent of maternal age, genetics and nutrition are necessary.…”
Section: Abstract: Offspring Size · Maternal Effect · Regenerationmentioning
confidence: 99%