The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2020.05.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intraspecific Adaptation Load: A Mechanism for Species Coexistence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
1
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result illustrates that sexual conflict and the competition between different types of males can lead to a 'tragedy of the commons', in concordance with empirical [47,48] and theoretical work [12,49]. A recent review [50] proposed the overarching term 'intraspecific adaptation load', which captures the competition and conflicts in our model and more general causes of conflicts with conspecifics (e.g. due to kin selection) at the expense of population fitness.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…This result illustrates that sexual conflict and the competition between different types of males can lead to a 'tragedy of the commons', in concordance with empirical [47,48] and theoretical work [12,49]. A recent review [50] proposed the overarching term 'intraspecific adaptation load', which captures the competition and conflicts in our model and more general causes of conflicts with conspecifics (e.g. due to kin selection) at the expense of population fitness.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…With increasing evidence for rapid contemporary evolution on ecological timescales (Hendry 2016), an interest in developing a broader theory of species coexistence that incorporates rapid evolution and eco-evolutionary feedbacks has grown (Tachikawa 2008; Kremer & Klausmeier 2013; Wittmann & Fukami 2018; Hart et al 2019; van Velzen 2020; Yamamichi et al 2020). By allowing for rapid evolution in mechanistic resource competition models, we have identified a new solution to the paradox of the plankton, deriving from relative nonlinearity of competition.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A wealth of empirical evidence has accumulated over the last few decades indicating that rapid contemporary evolution on ecological timescales (Hendry 2016) can be essential for understanding population dynamics (Yoshida et al 2003; Bell 2017). More recently, evidence has begun to emerge that rapid evolution can also be a significant driver of community dynamics amongst competing species, and in particular play an important role in regulating species coexistence (Lankau 2011; Vasseur et al 2011; Mougi 2013; Hiltunen et al 2017; Wittmann & Fukami 2018; Hart et al 2019; Germain et al 2020; van Velzen 2020; Yamamichi et al 2020). To date, however, rapid evolution has only been shown to promote species coexistence when there is either a trade-off between traits optimal for intraspecific and interspecific competition (Lankau 2011; Vasseur et al 2011; Mougi 2013; Wittmann & Fukami 2018; Yamamichi et al 2020) or fine-tuning of prey defenses and predator foraging efforts (Kondoh 2003; van Velzen 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Intraspecific reproductive interactions between the sexes, such as male mating harassment and the resulting sexual conflict, can reduce female fitness and decrease population growth rate (23)(24)(25)(26). Because male mating harassment and its fitness consequences for females is expected to be more intense when a species is common (23,(27)(28)(29)(30), sexual conflict can in theory, promote local species coexistence (19,20,31,32).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%