2015
DOI: 10.1193/110612eqs324m
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intraslab versus Interplate Earthquakes as Recorded in Mexico City: Implications for Seismic Hazard

Abstract: We study the relative importance of interplate and intraslab earthquakes in the seismic hazard of Mexico City by analyzing accelerograms recorded at the hill-zone site of CU (1964–2012) and the lake-bed site of SCT (1985–2012). Amax exceeded 6 gal during 20 earthquakes at CU during this period. Of these, eight were intraslab events so that the exceedance rate of Amax ≥ 6 gal from both types of earthquakes is roughly about the same. The estimated return period of Amax of 30 gal from the two types of earthquakes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A list of 20 earthquakes with largest recorded PGA at station CU in the same period consists of 11 interplate and 9 intraslab earthquakes (Ⓔ Table S1, available in the electronic supplement to this article). Analysis of these recordings reveals that the exceedance rate of PGA from the two types of earthquakes at station CU is about the same (Ordaz and Reyes, 1999;Iglesias et al, 2002;Singh et al, 2015). We note that the PGA of 57 cm=s 2 at station CU during the 2017 earthquake is the largest ever, twice that recorded during the 1985 earthquake (29 Gal).…”
Section: Previous Studies and Critical Role Of Recordings From Statiomentioning
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A list of 20 earthquakes with largest recorded PGA at station CU in the same period consists of 11 interplate and 9 intraslab earthquakes (Ⓔ Table S1, available in the electronic supplement to this article). Analysis of these recordings reveals that the exceedance rate of PGA from the two types of earthquakes at station CU is about the same (Ordaz and Reyes, 1999;Iglesias et al, 2002;Singh et al, 2015). We note that the PGA of 57 cm=s 2 at station CU during the 2017 earthquake is the largest ever, twice that recorded during the 1985 earthquake (29 Gal).…”
Section: Previous Studies and Critical Role Of Recordings From Statiomentioning
confidence: 60%
“…The awareness of the seismic hazard that intraslab earthquakes pose to Mexican altiplano, especially to Mexico City, has motivated detailed studies of many individual events (Singh and Wyss, 1976, 1996Hernandez et al, 2001;Iglesias et al, 2002;Santoyo et al, 2005; National Autonomous University of Mexico [UNAM] Seismology Group, 2010; Díaz-Mojica et al, 2014), the estimation of ground motion in the city from postulated intraslab earthquakes (Pacheco and Singh, 1995;Singh et al, 1996;Iglesias et al, 2002), the development of ground-motion prediction equations (GMPEs; García et al, 2005;Jaimes et al, 2015), and studies related with source characteristics of such earthquakes as compared with their interplate counterparts (García et al, 2004;Singh et al, 2014Singh et al, , 2015. Many of these studies benefitted from the recordings at a strong-motion station at CU located on basalt lava flows on the main campus of UNAM in Mexico City (Figs.…”
Section: Previous Studies and Critical Role Of Recordings From Statiomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The same is true with its ratio E r / M 0 = 5.7 × 10 − 5 in a large range of seismic moments (even for the value of E r obtained from teleseismic records by the NEIC which is 1 order of magnitude smaller; see last section and Figure 11 of UNAM Seismology Group []). This observation is not surprising for normal‐faulting earthquakes in the subducted Cocos plate, which systematically produce high peak ground accelerations [ García et al ., ; Singh et al ., ]. It seems then to be a paradox that prevents conciliating two main observations: (1) a slow and inefficient rupture process and (2) a remarkably high radiation of short period waves.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We recall that our dynamic source parameters have been retrieved by fitting band‐pass filtered (0.02 Hz–0.25 Hz) seismograms. The corner frequency, f c , of the earthquake, estimated from S wave spectra, is ~0.47 Hz [ Singh et al ., ]. For an ω 2 Brune source model, which assumes an infinite rupture speed, the radiated energy contained in frequencies f < f c is less than 18% of the total [ Singh and Ordaz , ].…”
Section: The Mw 65 Zumpango Earthquakementioning
confidence: 99%