2003
DOI: 10.1126/science.1090751
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intraslab Earthquakes: Dehydration of the Cascadia Slab

Abstract: We simultaneously invert travel times of refracted and wide-angle reflected waves for three-dimensional compressional-wave velocity structure, earthquake locations, and reflector geometry in northwest Washington state. The reflector, interpreted to be the crust-mantle boundary (Moho) of the subducting Juan de Fuca plate, separates intraslab earthquakes into two groups, permitting a new understanding of the origins of intraslab earthquakes in Cascadia. Earthquakes up-dip of the Moho's 45-kilometer depth contour… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

11
103
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
11
103
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since 1945, there have been several events with magnitudes >5.5, including the 6.8 Nisqually earthquake in 2001 that resulted in an estimated monetary loss of more than USD two billion (Kirby and Wang, 2002). Most of these events have epicenters located between 35 and 70 km depth, with some small events reaching depths up to 100 km (Preston et al, 2003). Additionally, the Puget lowland region of central and northern Washington, which is a focus of this study, experiences a much higher incidence of these earthquakes than neighboring regions to the north and south.…”
Section: The Cascadia Subduction Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since 1945, there have been several events with magnitudes >5.5, including the 6.8 Nisqually earthquake in 2001 that resulted in an estimated monetary loss of more than USD two billion (Kirby and Wang, 2002). Most of these events have epicenters located between 35 and 70 km depth, with some small events reaching depths up to 100 km (Preston et al, 2003). Additionally, the Puget lowland region of central and northern Washington, which is a focus of this study, experiences a much higher incidence of these earthquakes than neighboring regions to the north and south.…”
Section: The Cascadia Subduction Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intraslab earthquakes have been linked with a process in which fluids released during the transformation of hydrated metabasalts to eclogite in the upper crust increases pore pressure, thereby reactivating pre-existing faults (Kirby et al, 1996, Preston et al, 2003. Slow slip and low frequency tremor, which have been tentatively linked with the periodicity of great megathrust earthquakes (Mazzotti and Adams, 2004), can be explained by episodic buildup and release of fluid pore pressure across plate boundaries down-dip of the locked zone .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…generally thought to arise from dehydration reactions [Kao et al, 2008;Preston et al, 2003]. Reflection banding is also present above the megathrust and is likely related to fluids given the high electrical conductivity associated with this zone [Nedimović et al, 2003].…”
Section: The Cascadia Subduction Marginmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Audet et al, 2009;Bostock et al, 2002;Hacker et al, 2003;Kao et al, 2005;Preston et al, 2003;Rogers and Dragert, 2003;Walowski et al, 2015]. Prior studies within the interior of the JdF plate provide evidence for hydration of the upper crust associated with ridge flank hydrothermal circulation and spatially correlated with local zones of ridge propagation [McClymont and Clowes, 2005;Nedimović et al, 2009;Nedimović et al, 2008;Newman et al, 2011] but the full extent of when and how water is incorporated into the lithosphere during the evolution of the JdF plate, and how water is distributed at depth within the plate prior to subduction remains unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12] The three-dimensional (3-D) P wave velocity model for the YM region was developed with a nonlinear inversion procedure [Preston et al, 2003], an iterative technique that simultaneously solves for optimal earthquake locations and 3-D P wave velocity structure from P wave arrival times. The solution is regularized by seeking a smooth velocity structure.…”
Section: Data Method and Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%