2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-28994-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intrasession and Between-Visit Variability of Retinal Vessel Density Values Measured with OCT Angiography in Diabetic Patients

Abstract: In clinical practice the measurement error of an instrument has special importance in analyzing and interpreting data, and acknowledging limitations. The purpose of this study was to evaluate intrasession and between-visit reproducibility of OCT angiography measurements in diabetic patients. A total of 54 eyes of 27 diabetic patients underwent OCT angiography imaging. Foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area and superficial retinal vessel density (VD) at 3 mm were calculated using the AngioAnalytics software. Three co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(35 reference statements)
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The control group was rescanned throughout the follow-up to exclude other biasing external factors (repeatability biases). Of note, data regarding the variability of perfusion density and FAZ within a brief time-interval have been reported to have high levels of repeatability and reproducibility, both for healthy subjects and eyes affected by various retinal diseases [2830]. For further empowered potential follow-up studies, we calculated to include 64 subjects (that might be feasible with size- and center-doubling) to achieve a 30% reduction of effect size with a power of 0.8.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The control group was rescanned throughout the follow-up to exclude other biasing external factors (repeatability biases). Of note, data regarding the variability of perfusion density and FAZ within a brief time-interval have been reported to have high levels of repeatability and reproducibility, both for healthy subjects and eyes affected by various retinal diseases [2830]. For further empowered potential follow-up studies, we calculated to include 64 subjects (that might be feasible with size- and center-doubling) to achieve a 30% reduction of effect size with a power of 0.8.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A detailed overview of how different quantitative measures are derived from OCTA is beyond the scope of this review, but the reader is referred to a recent review article [184]. Briefly, although measurements by the same devices using the same processing algorithm may be reliable and reproducible [185][186][187][188], significant variability exists between different devices [189] and image processing methods [186]. Therefore, large population studies of multi-ethnic individuals will need to be collected for each OCTA device, to provide normative data of vascular measures as reference ranges.…”
Section: Limitations Of Optical Coherence Tomography Angiographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…OCT-A has been found to be a reproducible method to measure retinal vessel density with the automated AngioAnalytics software [22]. OCT-A has been shown to be a valuable tool in the follow up of CNV, after antiVEGF treatment in patients with nAMD but there are only a few reports on the retinal vascular system of nAMD patients [9].…”
Section: Group a Group B Control P (Group A Vs Control) P (Group B Vsmentioning
confidence: 99%