2020
DOI: 10.1111/pirs.12541
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intraregional trade shares for goods‐producing industries: RPC estimates using EU data

Abstract: The lack of subnational trade data has dampened the development of reliable regional and multiregional models for regional policy development. So, most researchers and vendors of regional and interregional economic models continue to rely on location quotients, supply-demand pool techniques, or minor modifications of them, despite knowing that they underestimate interregional trade. In this piece, we analyse the relative viability of estimates of intraregional trade-so called "regional purchase coefficients" (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(94 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the expression finally proposed for the estimation of δ becomes: italicln.25emδgoodbreak=1.2263goodbreak+0.1680.25emitalicln.25emRgoodbreak+0.3254.25emitalicln.25emPgoodbreak+0.3170.25emitalicln.25emFgoodbreak+e. In parallel to this proposal, the authors recognized the difficulty for the analyst to know with sufficient certainty the value of the regressors, so they proposed alternatively to present the variable p as the propensity of each region to import from other regions and f as the average use of foreign intermediate inputs in each region. Both are measured as a proportion of gross output, leaving the regression as follows: italicln.25emδgoodbreak=goodbreak−3.0665goodbreak+0.1680.25emitalicln.25emRgoodbreak+0.3254.25emitalicln.25empgoodbreak+0.3170.25emitalicln.25emfgoodbreak+e. Therefore, in order to parameterize the value of δ, it is necessary to have prior knowledge of interregional trade, the difficulty of which could lead to the impossibility of its proper establishment and even its application (Lahr et al, 2020). However, the fact that in these proposals (and even in the critique offered by Lahr et al, 2020) a direct relationship can be established between interregional trade and the value of the δ parameter leads one to estimate it from other readily available information.…”
Section: Estimation Of Parameter δ In Flq Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, the expression finally proposed for the estimation of δ becomes: italicln.25emδgoodbreak=1.2263goodbreak+0.1680.25emitalicln.25emRgoodbreak+0.3254.25emitalicln.25emPgoodbreak+0.3170.25emitalicln.25emFgoodbreak+e. In parallel to this proposal, the authors recognized the difficulty for the analyst to know with sufficient certainty the value of the regressors, so they proposed alternatively to present the variable p as the propensity of each region to import from other regions and f as the average use of foreign intermediate inputs in each region. Both are measured as a proportion of gross output, leaving the regression as follows: italicln.25emδgoodbreak=goodbreak−3.0665goodbreak+0.1680.25emitalicln.25emRgoodbreak+0.3254.25emitalicln.25empgoodbreak+0.3170.25emitalicln.25emfgoodbreak+e. Therefore, in order to parameterize the value of δ, it is necessary to have prior knowledge of interregional trade, the difficulty of which could lead to the impossibility of its proper establishment and even its application (Lahr et al, 2020). However, the fact that in these proposals (and even in the critique offered by Lahr et al, 2020) a direct relationship can be established between interregional trade and the value of the δ parameter leads one to estimate it from other readily available information.…”
Section: Estimation Of Parameter δ In Flq Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both are measured as a proportion of gross output, leaving the regression as follows: italicln.25emδgoodbreak=goodbreak−3.0665goodbreak+0.1680.25emitalicln.25emRgoodbreak+0.3254.25emitalicln.25empgoodbreak+0.3170.25emitalicln.25emfgoodbreak+e. Therefore, in order to parameterize the value of δ, it is necessary to have prior knowledge of interregional trade, the difficulty of which could lead to the impossibility of its proper establishment and even its application (Lahr et al, 2020). However, the fact that in these proposals (and even in the critique offered by Lahr et al, 2020) a direct relationship can be established between interregional trade and the value of the δ parameter leads one to estimate it from other readily available information.…”
Section: Estimation Of Parameter δ In Flq Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Direct collection of interregional trade data via survey is still considered to be too expensive (Lahr, Ferreira, and Többen 2020) and time consuming (Miller and Blair 2009), and, therefore, interregional trade is generally estimated. Lahr et al (Lahr, Ferreira, and Többen 2020) identify four families of estimation techniques: Location Quotients (LQ), Flegg-Location-Quotients (FLQ), Cross-Hauling Adjusted Regionalization Method (CHARM), and econometric approaches. Of these, the LQ has the lowest data requirement, requiring data on employment, labor compensation, or production by industry or commodity and by region of the MRIO model.…”
Section: Data Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lack of statistics data that cover the inter-provincial commodity trade in physical terms leads us to model the inter-provincial trade network. Main models that have been used to construct the inter-regional trade networks include computable general equilibrium (CGE) models (Partridge andRickman 1998, West 1995), gravity models (Leontief and Strout 1963, Theil 1967, entropy-maximizing approaches (Roy and Thill 2004, Snickars and Weibull 1977, Wilson 2011, optimization models (Dalin et al 2014, Zhuo et al 2019), and others for example non-survey models (Sargento et al 2012) or behavior-based models (Isard 1998, Lahr et al 2020). However, these models strongly rely on the priori trade information while perform quite differently to a context of very limited trade information.…”
Section: Uncertainty Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%