1987
DOI: 10.1093/ptj/67.9.1342
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intrarater Reliability of Manual Muscle Testing and Hand-held Dynametric Muscle Testing

Abstract: Physical therapists require an accurate, reliable method for measuring muscle strength. They often use manual muscle testing or hand-held dynametric muscle testing (DMT), but few studies document the reliability of MMT or compare the reliability of the two types of testing. We designed this study to determine the intrarater reliability of MMT and DMT. A physical therapist performed manual and dynametric strength tests of the same five muscle groups on 11 patients and then repeated the tests two days later. The… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
158
0
4

Year Published

1993
1993
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 251 publications
(162 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
158
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…We evaluated the test-retest reliability (separate days) for manual muscle testing in a small group (N ¼ 8) of individuals with SCI and found the intraclass correlations to be 0.82-0.99 for the eight lower limb muscle groups. Others [15][16][17] have also reported high reliability for upper and lower limb manual muscle testing in persons with SCI. The ASIA lower extremity muscle score (LEMS) was derived from Trace muscle contraction 1.5…”
Section: Subjects and Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We evaluated the test-retest reliability (separate days) for manual muscle testing in a small group (N ¼ 8) of individuals with SCI and found the intraclass correlations to be 0.82-0.99 for the eight lower limb muscle groups. Others [15][16][17] have also reported high reliability for upper and lower limb manual muscle testing in persons with SCI. The ASIA lower extremity muscle score (LEMS) was derived from Trace muscle contraction 1.5…”
Section: Subjects and Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its frequent use is attributable mostly to the ease with which the technique is performed in a short time with no instrumentation cost [11]. However, this technique has been criticized for its subjectivity and lack of reliability in the good to normal ranges [1,20,23]. Therefore, the isokinetic muscle performance test (IMPT) of the shoulder has been advocated because muscle strength can be objectively measured [8,9,19,24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 Nonetheless, the isometric strength measurement might be in¯uenced by the resistance that can be applied by the evaluator and by the ability to hold the myometer in a stable position, perpendicular to the segment. 7,19 Myometry requires much more time for positioning than MMT and the initial cost of the device can be seen as a limitation to its general use.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%