2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.11.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intrapyloric Botulinum Injection Increases Postoperative Esophagectomy Complications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, Eldaif et al found that patients receiving botulinum injections exhibited a higher rate of postoperative reflux symptoms and increased use of promotility agents and more frequently required postoperative endoscopic interventions. Therefore, the authors concluded that intrapyloric botulinum toxin injections should not be used as an alternative to standard drainage procedures [ 33 ]. Consequently, the value of botulinum toxin injections as an alternative approach to reduce postoperative gastric outlet obstruction remains controversial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, Eldaif et al found that patients receiving botulinum injections exhibited a higher rate of postoperative reflux symptoms and increased use of promotility agents and more frequently required postoperative endoscopic interventions. Therefore, the authors concluded that intrapyloric botulinum toxin injections should not be used as an alternative to standard drainage procedures [ 33 ]. Consequently, the value of botulinum toxin injections as an alternative approach to reduce postoperative gastric outlet obstruction remains controversial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theoretically, botulinum toxin could weaken the pyloric smooth muscles temporarily during the early postoperative period, and the relaxing effect might disappear along with potentially decreased bile reflux and dumping syndrome within 12 weeks. However, Eldaif et al [39] reported that although the use of IPBT significantly decreased the operative time compared to pyloromyotomy and pyloroplasty, the patients who received IPBT suffered from more reflux symptoms, had more frequent use of promotility drugs, needed more frequent endoscopic pyloric interventions, and had no benefits compared to those who underwent pyloromyotomy and pyloroplasty in terms of reducing dumping symptoms. In a well-matched cohort study, Stewart et al [40] demonstrated a similar incidence of DGE between patients who received no pyloric intervention and those who received IPBT in the setting of minimally invasive esophagectomy.…”
Section: Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preliminary case series showed that IBTJ could be safely performed in esophagectomy patients (15,16) and a comparative study recommended IBTJ over pyloroplasty based on similar effect with simpler technique and less pyloric damage (17). However, further study found that although IBTJ might significantly decrease operative time, patients receiving IBTJ experienced more DGE and reflux compared to the ones receiving pyloroplasty or pyloromyotomy (18). Furthermore, a study doubted the necessity of IBTJ in minimally invasive esophagectomy patients as both IBTJ and no-intervention controlled group had low incidence of DGE (IBTJ: 8.6%, 3/35 vs.…”
Section: Ibtjmentioning
confidence: 99%