Abstract:Intraprofessional rivalry has a long history. This article examines earnings disparities as a dimension of intraprofessional competition among avocats and notaires in the civil law system of Québec, Canada. Drawing on two large‐scale surveys and in‐depth interviews with legal professionals, I examine three competing perspectives of earnings inequalities: human capital, social‐symbolic capital, and organizational‐structural explanations. Through this analysis I seek to examine whether similar causal processes s… Show more
“…Professionals often establish a common identity to increase feelings of group membership and navigate role ambiguity (Lounsbury 1998a;Lamont and Molnár 2002;Pilear 2018). Professionals can also establish a common identity to enhance collaboration (Kay 2009;Comeau-Vallée and Langley 2020). Within a profession, such as law, there can be segments or emerging specialties that distinguish themselves because of their client types, methodology, colleagueship, interests, and associations (Bucher and Strauss 1961).…”
Section: Establishing a Common Group Identitymentioning
Law firm pro bono work provides access to justice to low-income people and other vulnerable populations. The professionals that manage pro bono programs are at the forefront of that process. The limited available research on these professionals do not often distinguish lawyers from other managers or theorize about their status vis-à-vis other law firm lawyers. Yet the status of lawyers who are also managers of pro bono programs influences both their identities and the management and provision of legal services and advocacy. Drawing on original demographic and interview data, this article shows how law firm pro bono partners and counsels navigate their ambiguous roles and negotiate their status as lawyers and managers. I find that pro bono partners and counsels navigate their ambiguous roles by striving to be perceived as “real” lawyers, reframe their roles as business generators, conform to the billing culture, and establish a common identity. They also negotiate their titles and office spaces to raise their profiles. Gender inequality influences the negotiation of office spaces and the approval of pro bono matters. These findings have implications for lawyers who manage pro bono programs and the legitimacy of pro bono work.
“…Professionals often establish a common identity to increase feelings of group membership and navigate role ambiguity (Lounsbury 1998a;Lamont and Molnár 2002;Pilear 2018). Professionals can also establish a common identity to enhance collaboration (Kay 2009;Comeau-Vallée and Langley 2020). Within a profession, such as law, there can be segments or emerging specialties that distinguish themselves because of their client types, methodology, colleagueship, interests, and associations (Bucher and Strauss 1961).…”
Section: Establishing a Common Group Identitymentioning
Law firm pro bono work provides access to justice to low-income people and other vulnerable populations. The professionals that manage pro bono programs are at the forefront of that process. The limited available research on these professionals do not often distinguish lawyers from other managers or theorize about their status vis-à-vis other law firm lawyers. Yet the status of lawyers who are also managers of pro bono programs influences both their identities and the management and provision of legal services and advocacy. Drawing on original demographic and interview data, this article shows how law firm pro bono partners and counsels navigate their ambiguous roles and negotiate their status as lawyers and managers. I find that pro bono partners and counsels navigate their ambiguous roles by striving to be perceived as “real” lawyers, reframe their roles as business generators, conform to the billing culture, and establish a common identity. They also negotiate their titles and office spaces to raise their profiles. Gender inequality influences the negotiation of office spaces and the approval of pro bono matters. These findings have implications for lawyers who manage pro bono programs and the legitimacy of pro bono work.
“…Another important resource that worker centers may have to build a worker-centered moral economy for the twenty-first century is "symbolic capital." 57 While social capital in this article refers to a structural position of actors that provides them with strategic advantages in a network, symbolic capital is generally understood as being synonymous with prestige and status. 58 We can hypothesize that symbolic capital provides an actor with the capacity to draw attention from others outside his or her network.…”
Section: B Symbolic Capital or The Importance Of Getting Public Attmentioning
“…The system of exclusive jurisdictions in Quebec specifies that notaries traditionally practice in the areas of real estate, wills and estates, marriages and family mediation (Kay, 2009); litigation (criminal law, civil litigation, divorce, and so on) and advocacy are the realm of avocats, and only avocats can be appointed judges (Kay and Brockman, 2000). For example, the term 'attorney' is more commonly used in the United States than in Canada to refer to a lawyer or litigator.…”
Section: Systems Of Law Professional Roles and Titlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some common law countries (e.g., Canada, the United Kingdom, and Ireland) require a similar period that lasts several months, followed by a bar admissions examination (Kay, 2009). Historically, legal professionals trained through a system of apprenticeship in law offices.…”
Section: Education Licensing and Practice Settingsmentioning
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.