2016
DOI: 10.1111/evo.13095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intrapopulation genomics in a model mutualist: Population structure and candidate symbiosis genes under selection in Medicago truncatula

Abstract: Bottom-up evolutionary approaches, including geographically explicit population genomic analyses, have the power to reveal the mechanistic basis of adaptation. Here, we conduct a population genomic analysis in the model legume, Medicago truncatula, to characterize population genetic structure and identify symbiosis-related genes showing evidence of spatially variable selection. Using RAD-seq, we generated over 26,000 SNPs from 191 accessions from within three regions of the native range in Europe. Results from… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
24
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
4
24
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with previous experiments (Heath and Tiffin ; Grillo et al. ; Burghardt et al. ), strain fitness depended strongly on host genotype and was skewed so that less than one‐fifth of the strains increased in relative frequency inside nodules (relative fitness > 0; Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Consistent with previous experiments (Heath and Tiffin ; Grillo et al. ; Burghardt et al. ), strain fitness depended strongly on host genotype and was skewed so that less than one‐fifth of the strains increased in relative frequency inside nodules (relative fitness > 0; Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This is somehow expected as constrained natural variability on these essential symbiotic genes due to selective processes was often found in previous nucleotide polymorphism analyses (De Mita et al, 2006;De Mita et al, 2007;Grillo et al, 2016) and in previous GWAS studies performed on nodulation phenotypes (Stanton-Geddes et al, 2013). This also suggests that these genes are not major determinants of natural variability in root developmental responses to LCOs, although some LysM-RLK genetic variants likely account for rhizobia host-specificity (Sulima et al, 2017;Sulima et al, 2019).…”
Section: Endosymbiosis Associated Locisupporting
confidence: 64%
“…While these genotypes were not selected due to a priori phenotypic differentiation, our previous work indicates that they possess genetic variation for symbiosis related genes and phenotypes. These genotypes are differentiated at DMI1, a key symbiosis gene known to be under selection in nature [109,110].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%