2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00404-019-05419-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intrapartum PRSA: a new method to predict fetal acidosis?—a case-control study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been used as a measure of heart rate variability [15][16][17] but can be adapted to average the magnitude of all falls in FHR between successive heartbeats and so provide an integrated measure of the magnitude and frequency of FHR decelerations. 12,15 DC has been shown to predict acidaemia or fetal compromise in a cohort study of >22 000 human labours 10 and to be associated with acidaemia in fetal sheep. 18 DC does not rely on correctly identifying baseline FHR and decelerations, as is required to measure DA, and it is very tolerant of noise and loss of contact during FHR recording.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It has been used as a measure of heart rate variability [15][16][17] but can be adapted to average the magnitude of all falls in FHR between successive heartbeats and so provide an integrated measure of the magnitude and frequency of FHR decelerations. 12,15 DC has been shown to predict acidaemia or fetal compromise in a cohort study of >22 000 human labours 10 and to be associated with acidaemia in fetal sheep. 18 DC does not rely on correctly identifying baseline FHR and decelerations, as is required to measure DA, and it is very tolerant of noise and loss of contact during FHR recording.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We analysed end of labour FHR data which are fundamentally different from pre-labour (antepartum) FHR data [5]. Antepartum FHR data are more likely to be stable and usually do not have decelerations, whereas end-of-labour traces are more likely to be unstable, with frequent signal loss and FHR decelerations [5,32] as observed in our study.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 77%
“…Our previous proof-of-concept work, to which Sholapurkar refers, reported the accuracy of DC and a prototype Oxford System (OXSYS1.5) on over 22 790 births. 4 Receiver operating characteristics curves were not directly applicable and so are not shown, but the data-driven approach had comparable sensitivity and specificity to experienced clinicians. This analysis did not use a 'black box' approach, but well-documented algorithms, in a similar way to our study in fetal sheep.…”
Section: Sirmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…1 Another cohort study on 11 980 women showed the area under curve (AUC) for DC to be 0.66. 4 This AUC reveals that if we want to detect 90%, 80% or 50% of acidaemic babies, the same deceleration capacity (DC) was shared by 80%, 60%, 25% of normal babies, respectively, making DC disappointing for clinical application. 4 Similarly, AUCs for deceleration area (DA) in human studies are very comparable and demonstrate DA to be unhelpful in practice.…”
Section: Sirmentioning
confidence: 99%