2000
DOI: 10.1053/joms.2000.18283
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intraoral mandibular distraction osteogenesis in a patient with severe micrognathia secondary to TMJ ankylosis using a tooth and bone–anchored device (PIT device): A case report

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These observations were in accordance with the findings of Douglas, Burton, and Smith,[12] who reported that intraoral appliances have had advantages over extraoral devices by not only reducing or eliminating the problems of facial scarring caused by transcutaneous pins, but also by avoiding the emotional and cosmetic disadvantages of an extraoral appliance. However, intraoral devices are somewhat difficult to place and their removal could be as difficult as the initial placement.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…These observations were in accordance with the findings of Douglas, Burton, and Smith,[12] who reported that intraoral appliances have had advantages over extraoral devices by not only reducing or eliminating the problems of facial scarring caused by transcutaneous pins, but also by avoiding the emotional and cosmetic disadvantages of an extraoral appliance. However, intraoral devices are somewhat difficult to place and their removal could be as difficult as the initial placement.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…A distraction devices is used to induce bone growth in the site of deformity (1). Long-term stability of DO has not been well documented, and some studies have found cases of instability and recurrence (2)(3)(4)(5). Therefore, some authors have attempted to accelerate bone maturation and to improve the physical properties of lengthened bone (6)(7)(8).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chin deviates to the affected side and retrognathia occurs. 22 In this clinical report, distraction osteogenesis was performed in the growing mandibular bone. 6 In this report unilateral intraoral distraction osteogenesis was chosen to correct the secondary deformity over more conventional osteotomies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,22 This technique causes the delay of postoperative mandibular movement, jaw opening exercises and physical therapy, which can cause negative results of the arthroplasty. 7,22 This technique causes the delay of postoperative mandibular movement, jaw opening exercises and physical therapy, which can cause negative results of the arthroplasty.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%