2016
DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20150326
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intraoralversusextraoral bitewing radiography in detection of enamel proximal caries: anex vivostudy

Abstract: Within the limits of the ex vivo design, the difference in diagnostic accuracy between the three radiographic techniques was not significant. EO BW could be used in the detection of enamel proximal caries with results comparable with intraoral bitewing with PSP plate and CMOS sensor.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Proximal lesions are hard to visualize during the clinical exam, and if not detected during the initial stages, radiographs and tooth separation often reveal their presence Evidence of a proximal lesion in one tooth raises significant concerns since the neighboring tooth in most cases is also affected. Proximal lesions do eventually appear clinically as opaque areas on buccal and lingual surfaces [45][46][47].…”
Section: Interproximal Cariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proximal lesions are hard to visualize during the clinical exam, and if not detected during the initial stages, radiographs and tooth separation often reveal their presence Evidence of a proximal lesion in one tooth raises significant concerns since the neighboring tooth in most cases is also affected. Proximal lesions do eventually appear clinically as opaque areas on buccal and lingual surfaces [45][46][47].…”
Section: Interproximal Cariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The receiver operating curves, or ROC curves, are a widely accepted method for the evaluation and comparison of performance of a test [18][19][20][21]. ROC curves have been used extensively in medicine; in dentistry, they are beginning to be used in radiology in areas like early caries detection, maxillary canine impaction and cephalometric diagnosis of skeletal patterns [22,23,[29][30][31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 The diagnostic accuracy of digital systems and film-based radiographs has been compared for several diagnostic-specific tasks, with different results. [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] However, the authors are aware of only 2 studies that addressed diagnostic accuracy for the detection of misfits at the implant-prosthesis interface, with conflicting results regarding comparisons between CCD systems and film-based radiographs. 8,9 Digital radiographs obtained with digital systems can be either visualized with the same software program used for imaging acquisition (proprietary software program) or in an imaging viewer (third-party software program).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%