2013
DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(12)70527-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intraoperative ultrasound guidance for palpable breast cancer excision (COBALT trial): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
104
1
7

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 165 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
9
104
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…With the use of intraoperative US, the rate of reexcisions, the volume of resection, and the rate of involved margins are significantly reduced according to a randomized study [20] and a recent metaanalysis [21]. That is why intraoperative US can be performed as a method to reduce the reexcision rate and rate of R1 resections (LoE 1a, A, AGO +/-).…”
Section: Hereditary Breast Cancer and Preventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the use of intraoperative US, the rate of reexcisions, the volume of resection, and the rate of involved margins are significantly reduced according to a randomized study [20] and a recent metaanalysis [21]. That is why intraoperative US can be performed as a method to reduce the reexcision rate and rate of R1 resections (LoE 1a, A, AGO +/-).…”
Section: Hereditary Breast Cancer and Preventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although changing disease-and patient-related factors is difficult, there are structural and process-related measures that could potentially be implemented to reduce the need for reoperation. Possibilities include the use of intraoperative imprint cytology 1 , cavity margin shaving 40 , and other technologies 41,42 . Others have focused on the effects of education initiatives 43 or guidelines 44 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past years, our study group has extensively published on this subject, resulting in a multicenter, randomized controlled trial including 134 patients. 2 Although the term ''CUBE'' is indeed novel, the technique itself is an exact copy of the technique we-among other authors-have repeatedly described. [3][4][5][6][7] Needless to say, it would have been appropriate for the authors to refer to these studies while presenting their results, and we are somewhat disappointed that the journal did not revise the literature list on behalf of the authors.…”
Section: To the Editormentioning
confidence: 99%