2010
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.7230
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intraoperative ultrasonographic detection of communicating veins between adjacent hepatic veins during hepatectomy for tumours at the hepatocaval confluence

Abstract: EF-IOUS estimation of the frequency of communicating veins between adjacent hepatic veins suggests that such veins are common. This may facilitate parenchyma-sparing procedures in patients with hepatic tumours encroaching on major hepatic veins.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, we did not experience a single case of congestion, and this is strictly related to the extensive use of EF-IOUS which has allowed the disclosure of communicating veins between adjacent hepatic veins in most patients with tumor located at the hepatocaval confluence. Indeed, in a recent report we have shown how communicating veins appear on EF-IOUS in 80% of such patients [23]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we did not experience a single case of congestion, and this is strictly related to the extensive use of EF-IOUS which has allowed the disclosure of communicating veins between adjacent hepatic veins in most patients with tumor located at the hepatocaval confluence. Indeed, in a recent report we have shown how communicating veins appear on EF-IOUS in 80% of such patients [23]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the surgical incision; in patients with tumors at the caval confluence or in the paracaval portion of S1, a J-shaped thoracoabdominal incision was carried out to control the backflow bleeding and to better position the left hand of the operator for guiding resection. Second, the intraoperative ultrasound was performed for staging and resection guidance [20]. Third, the whole liver mobilization was done to achieve complete vascular control and to define transection planes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In case of superficial lesions, single-session multiple resections are commonly adopted, but in case of deep-located CLM, TSH is the preferred option. Torzilli et al [20-22] reported the possibility to perform E-OSH even in presence of deep-located lesions thanks to the combination of intraoperative ultrasound guidance, the detachment of metastases in contact with vessels, and the identification of communicating veins (CV) among hepatic veins (HV) to preserve an adequate outflow. This strategy minimized the need for parenchyma sacrifice and major hepatectomy [21, 23, 24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, hepatic vein resection even at caval confluence does not imply extension of the hepatectomy. Indeed, if accessory veins as an inferior right hepatic vein (IRHV) (16) or communicating veins (CV) (17) are present (Fig. 3), parenchyma sparing can be warranted anyway.…”
Section: Resection-guidancementioning
confidence: 99%