2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(01)00658-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intraoperative sentinel lymph node mapping in patients with colon cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The literature search identified 17 studies, 15 describing SLN mapping using blue dye 16,[18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] and two describing SLN mapping using a combination of blue dye and radiocolloid. 9,32 For one study that used both blue dye and radiocolloid in the first few cases, but, since the same SLNs were identified with both tracers, subsequently only used blue dye in the remaining cases, the reported results were ascribed to blue dye only.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The literature search identified 17 studies, 15 describing SLN mapping using blue dye 16,[18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] and two describing SLN mapping using a combination of blue dye and radiocolloid. 9,32 For one study that used both blue dye and radiocolloid in the first few cases, but, since the same SLNs were identified with both tracers, subsequently only used blue dye in the remaining cases, the reported results were ascribed to blue dye only.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9,16,[18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]31 Immunohistochemical staining was carried out using antibodies against cytokeratin (CK) and in one study against carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). 23 The use of RT-PCR was only described in one study.…”
Section: Pathological Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since 1999 numerous papers on the SN technique in colorectal cancer have been published, with a wide range of results in terms of accuracy and false negatives: False-negative rates in fact vary from 0% to 60% [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36]. This astonishing range has several explanations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lack of standardization of the SLNM procedure results in different study group characteristics, resulting in heterogeneous accuracy (10) . Sensitivity has been revealed to be as low as 38% (4) and as high as 100% (9) , with identification rates ranging from 58% (3) to 100% (7) and false negatives from 0% (7) to 60% (6) . A precise definition of patients to be submitted to SLNM might also affect positively in the method's upstaging rate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%