2022
DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10112873
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intraoperative Optical Coherence Tomography in the Management of Macular Holes: State of the Art and Future Perspectives

Abstract: Background: Non-invasive diagnostic technologies in ophthalmology have substantially transformed contemporary clinical practice. Intraoperative optical coherence tomography (iOCT) systems have recently been used for various surgical interventions, including the treatment of full-thickness macular holes (FTMHs). Materials and Methods: We conducted a systematic review on the use of iOCT and its possible benefits in the management of FTMHs, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-A… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 53 publications
(73 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This small dimension was interpreted by our study group to be clinically irrelevant because the outline of the underlying tissue could still be easily identified 20 . This was also the approach taken by several studies that developed similar analytical interpretations or adopted such benchmarks in their study design 2 , 7 . Yet, this discrepancy prompts the need to establish objective criteria that determine what a clinically relevant interference is, to create a standard unitary interpretation that could ensure analysis reproductivity and enhance the compatibility of future references of the data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This small dimension was interpreted by our study group to be clinically irrelevant because the outline of the underlying tissue could still be easily identified 20 . This was also the approach taken by several studies that developed similar analytical interpretations or adopted such benchmarks in their study design 2 , 7 . Yet, this discrepancy prompts the need to establish objective criteria that determine what a clinically relevant interference is, to create a standard unitary interpretation that could ensure analysis reproductivity and enhance the compatibility of future references of the data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%