2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.nec.2009.04.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intraoperative MRI: Safety

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8,9 Institutional protocols [10][11][12] and checklists should be prepared 13 and strictly adhered to for each case. 14,15 Continuous data recording and auditing helped us reduce mistakes, personnel requirement, and also time taken to conduct the iMRI. 16 Learning points from our experience in this regard to ensure smooth functioning of the setup have been summarized (►Table 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,9 Institutional protocols [10][11][12] and checklists should be prepared 13 and strictly adhered to for each case. 14,15 Continuous data recording and auditing helped us reduce mistakes, personnel requirement, and also time taken to conduct the iMRI. 16 Learning points from our experience in this regard to ensure smooth functioning of the setup have been summarized (►Table 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MR systems are increasingly being installed in environments outside of conventional diagnostic MR facilities. Examples of such facilities include intraoperative/interventional MR, positron emission tomography (PET) MR, and MR‐guided radiation therapy . Each of these facilities present unique challenges to implementing MR safety policies and standard operating procedures, particularly with regard to personnel, screening, site contamination and infection control, and adverse event management.…”
Section: Emerging Areas Of Mr Safety Concernmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The incidence of complete tumor resection was significantly higher using intraoperative MRI with no increase in neurological deficits compared to conventional surgery ( p = 0.023) ( 13 , 14 ). The intraoperative MRI is inconvenient due to its bulky coil that encroaches on limited surgical space, and its strong magnetic field requires MRI compatible tools and supplies when surgery is performed in the magnetic field ( 15 , 16 ). Although the ioMRI scanner in which the patient is fixed in one position has several advantages (no need to move the patient during the operation, which could lead to potential anesthetic complications, a shorter time to obtain images), it requires non-ferro-magnetic instruments that are not as robust as conventional neurosurgical instruments.…”
Section: Intraoperative Delineation Of Gliomasmentioning
confidence: 99%