Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2022
DOI: 10.1089/neu.2021.0310
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intraoperative Monitoring of CSF Pressure in Patients with Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy (COMP-CORD Study): A Prospective Cohort Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Beyond the CSF opening pressure, continuous high-resolution recording enables the measurement of CSFP amplitude variations induced by cardiovascular action (CSFPp). While this has been investigated in selected cohorts of patients suffering from various disorders at bedside (e.g., in intracranial hypertension [ 5 ] and Chiari malformation [ 16 ]) or intraoperatively (e.g., in syringomyelia [ 35 ], spinal cord injury [ 29 ], and degenerative cervical myelopathy; DCM [ 48 ]), lumbar CSFPp in healthy subjects are rather poorly studied. In 10 patients without intracranial pathology, an average CSFPp of 0.7 mmHg was observed [ 43 ], and another study reported an average lumbar CSFPp of 2.0 mmHg in 40 healthy elderly volunteers [ 25 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beyond the CSF opening pressure, continuous high-resolution recording enables the measurement of CSFP amplitude variations induced by cardiovascular action (CSFPp). While this has been investigated in selected cohorts of patients suffering from various disorders at bedside (e.g., in intracranial hypertension [ 5 ] and Chiari malformation [ 16 ]) or intraoperatively (e.g., in syringomyelia [ 35 ], spinal cord injury [ 29 ], and degenerative cervical myelopathy; DCM [ 48 ]), lumbar CSFPp in healthy subjects are rather poorly studied. In 10 patients without intracranial pathology, an average CSFPp of 0.7 mmHg was observed [ 43 ], and another study reported an average lumbar CSFPp of 2.0 mmHg in 40 healthy elderly volunteers [ 25 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this purpose, we aim at exploring the utility of CSFP assessments in ambiguous cases of DCM. Previously, we have provided evidence that intraoperative CSFP dynamics are responsive to surgical decompression ( 18 ). For bedside testing, we hypothesized that CSFP dynamics would allow to determine effective spinal obstruction in these ambiguous DCM cases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%