2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2017.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intraoperative femoral head dislodgement during total hip arthroplasty: a report of four cases

Abstract: Dislodgment of trial femoral heads and migration into the pelvis during total hip arthroplasty is a rarely reported complication with limited published cases. There are three primary mechanisms of femoral head separation: dislodgement during reduction attempt, disassociation from anterior dislocation while assessing anterior stability, and during dislocation after implant trialing. If the trial femoral migrates beyond the pelvic brim, it is safer to finish the total hip arthroplasty and address the retained ob… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(111 reference statements)
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We believe that subsequent internal rotation probably occurred as the hip attempted to relocate, resulting in impaction of the femoral head against the acetabular component rim and disengagement. Other risk factors for component separation, including obesity and reduced head–neck ratio,1 were not applicable to this case (body mass index 26, standard offset prosthetic head).…”
Section: Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We believe that subsequent internal rotation probably occurred as the hip attempted to relocate, resulting in impaction of the femoral head against the acetabular component rim and disengagement. Other risk factors for component separation, including obesity and reduced head–neck ratio,1 were not applicable to this case (body mass index 26, standard offset prosthetic head).…”
Section: Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Dislocation of trial femoral head prosthesis is an uncommon complication of total hip arthroplasty, and the literature on management of this clinical scenario is sparse 1–3. Options for management that have been described include permanently leaving the trial prosthesis in situ,1 retrieval of the trial prosthesis at the time of initial procedure via one of a variety of open approaches (extended hip approach,4 modified Stoppa approach5 or ilioinguinal approach6), and retrieval at a subsequent procedure via laparotomy7 or laparoscopy 8…”
Section: Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several options when challenged with such a situation: leave the trial head in the body without further intervention; extend the hip incision to retrieve it during the arthroplasty procedure; or complete the arthroplasty procedure, determine the location of the trial femoral head using advanced imaging techniques (such as computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging), and arrange for a subsequent surgical intervention. 3 Typically, the third option is chosen but this is time-consuming and involves coordinating multidisciplinary teams. Furthermore, transportation of an anesthetized patient out of the operating room for advanced imaging is challenging in itself and it may compromise the patients' safety.…”
Section: To the Editormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most case reports indicate that, after being lost in the surgical field, the trial heads had migrated to adjacent cavities, beneath or along the iliopsoas muscle through the lacuna musculorum of the inguinal canal along the anterior pelvic brim. 3 In this region, other than the ileum, there are no bony structures. Theoretically, a hyperechoic structure should be readily identified in this area with ultrasound scanning.…”
Section: To the Editormentioning
confidence: 99%