Summary:Purpose: To analyze the best surgical procedure for patients with epileptic seizures and cerebral lesions-i.e., resection restricted to the lesion or resection associated with the adjacent irritative area-based on the clinical evolution of patients' seizure outcome and electroencephalographic (EEG) and electrocorticographic (ECoG) findings.Methods: This study comprised 37 patients with epileptic seizures and cerebral lesions, ranging in age from 9 to 66 years. Patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 consisted of 21 patients with medically intractable epilepsy, Group 2 of 16 patients with medically controlled epilepsy. Eleven of the 21 patients in Group 1 (Subgroup A) underwent surgical resection of the cerebral lesion and adjacent irritative area as shown by ECoG. For the remaining 10 patients in Group 1 (Subgroup B), the resection was restricted to the lesion. The 16 patients in Group 2 all underwent lesionectomies.Results: Of the 11 patients in group 1 who underwent resection of the cerebral lesion and adjacent irritative area, 91% became seizure free. Sixty percent of the remaining patients in group 1 whose resections were restricted to the lesion also became seizure free, as did all the patients in group 2. An overall analysis of the EEGs for all patients showed a statistically significant decrease in paroxysmal activity.Conclusions: In patients with uncontrolled seizures, resection of the cerebral lesion associated with the irritative area shows a tendency to obtain better seizure-outcome results than restricted lesionectomy. Key Words: Epilepsy tumors-Epilepsy surgery-Lesionectomy-Electrocorticography .In 1887, Victor Horsley [as summarized by Taylor (l)] operated on a patient with partial motor seizures caused by a cerebral tuberculoma. The surgery resulted in a significant reduction in the patient's seizures, supporting a relationship between the lesion and the development of seizures. According to Foerster & Penfield ( 2 ) , the correlation between an irritative brain area and cortical scars caused by head trauma was associated with a good prognosis for control of seizures when the scars were surgically removed. Some authors, such as Falconer and Cavanagh (3) and Rasmussen (4), began additional procedures for surgery of cerebral lesions, not only to remove tumors and arteriovenous malformations (AVM), but not only tumoral resections but also lobectomies on the area that contained the lesion. Rasmussen (4) and Yeh et al.(1 2) sought to locate the irritative area [i.e., the cortical region that contains the epileptogenous area, as defined by Luders and Awad (13)] through electrocorticography (ECoG) and to perform the lesionectomy associated with the adjacent irritative area. Our objective was to analyze whether restricted lesionectomy or lesionectomy with resection of the adjacent irritative cortex is the best approach to treating patients with epileptic seizures and focal cerebral lesions, based on surgical outcome.
PATIENTS AND METHODSalso to relieve patients from epileptic seizures. Thus...