2018
DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezy343
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intraoperative conversion during video-assisted thoracoscopy does not constitute a treatment failure†

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There has been no significant differences identified between dogs that had lung tumors removed via thoracoscopy or VATS or via open thoracotomy [50,52]. This is similar to the current human literature in which both morbidity and mortality outcomes appear to be similar for MIS versus open thoracotomy [58,59].…”
Section: Thoracoscopysupporting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There has been no significant differences identified between dogs that had lung tumors removed via thoracoscopy or VATS or via open thoracotomy [50,52]. This is similar to the current human literature in which both morbidity and mortality outcomes appear to be similar for MIS versus open thoracotomy [58,59].…”
Section: Thoracoscopysupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Reasons for conversion include hemorrhage (intercostal artery), failure to maintain OLV and poor access/visualization due to location of the tumor [50,51]. This is slightly higher than conversion rates in the human literature (18%) for VATS resection of primary lung tumors [58]. Other complications include port site inflammation and infection; infection in these cases can extend into the thoracic cavity and result in pyothorax.…”
Section: Thoracoscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studying intraoperative conversion prospectively seems almost impracticable, so we aimed to evaluate retrospectively the short-term outcomes of patient treated with VATS with intraoperative conversion to thoracotomy compared with those treated with thoracotomy upfront. Following a propensity score analysis with adjustment (no matching), because of a more comorbid cohort of patient in the VATS with conversion group, we observed a 90-day mortality rate of 5.4% vs. 3.7% between the VATS conversion and Thoracotomy group respectively, without statistical significant difference (1). We enhanced this evaluation by assessing risk factors for postoperative mortality in the cohort, finding no differences related to the surgical approach (VATS with conversion vs. thoracotomy) after multivariate analysis (1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…45 Conversion from minimally invasive to open surgery may not increase postoperative morbidity or mortality risk. 46 On the other hand, as robotic thoracic surgery is increasingly adopted, awareness of the risks inherent in this complex new technology has grown, and a group of European thoracic surgeons recently proposed a standardized training curriculum for young doctors. 47 Although robotic and other innovative surgical approaches such as uniportal or subxiphoid VATS are receiving more attention, their additional functional benefit is questionable, as traditional VATS incisions cause loss of only 5% of pulmonary function.…”
Section: Minimally Invasive Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%