The retrospective study by Schmaranzer et al. is well written and evaluates a cohort of pediatric patients who underwent closed or open reduction for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) between 2000 and 2018. We congratulate the authors on presenting one of the largest series of patients with DDH followed over the long term and, to our knowledge, over the longest term with available advanced imaging (magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]) data. Preliminary results of this investigation were presented at the annual meeting of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America (POSNA) in 2019.The authors investigated the ability of post-reduction MRI to "predict" which hips would develop residual acetabular dysplasia (RAD) at a minimum of 10 years of follow-up. They found that coronal femoroacetabular distance, a quantitative metric assessing the reduction concentricity, and limbus thickness, a quantitative metric assessing the lateral cartilaginous component of the acetabulum, could distinguish between hips with normal acetabular development and those with RAD at long-term follow-up.As a retrospective study, this has the inherently associated biases and limitations. Most notable is potential selection bias given that 37% of patients were lost to follow-up. Sampling bias might also be present because the investigation site is a highly specialized tertiary referral center. In this light, readers should critically assess the external validity of the authors' results. Femoroacetabular distance and limbus thickness, despite demonstrating high interrater reliability, are complex measurements. They rely on proper MRI positioning and orientation and the choice of a very specific MRI "slice" in both the coronal and axial planes.The risk of anesthesia for young children has also come to light during the data-collection period for this study. Like many before them, the authors show that earlier hip reduction leads to better results. Specifically, in this study, the median age of hip reduction for those without RAD was 3.6 months. With concerns at many institutions about anesthesia-related developmental complications for patients <6 months of age, the use of anesthesia for post-reduction MRI poses further questions about the widespread use of this technique. Finally, concerns have been raised in the literature about gadolinium deposition after contrastenhanced MRI 1,2 . These concerns make post-reduction MRI, and certainly perfusion MRI, a much less desirable option.The reader might ask, "Is post-reduction MRI the future?" Traditionally, radiographic, ultrasound, or computed tomography (CT) imaging is done immediately after surgery to verify the adequacy of hip reduction. Compared with all 3 methods, postreduction MRI is typically the slowest, most complex, and most expensive study to obtain.MRI almost universally necessitates that the patient leave the operating room for transportation to the MRI suite. With the development of low-dose intraoperative CT protocols and the gradual adaptation of perfusion ultrasound, there are ...