Intraocular Omni-focal Lens With Increased Tolerance to Decentration and Astigmatism

Yaish, Shai Ben; Zlotnik, Alex; Raveh, Ido; Yehezkel, Oren; Belkin, Michael; Zalevsky, Zeev

doi:10.3928/1081597x-20101215-12

Cited by 19 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In in vitro experiments, EDOF technology provides clear and focused vision across near, intermediate, and distance ranges [ 43 ]. In population-based research, EDOF has been proven to perform better than monofocal IOLs at intermediate and near distances [ 6 , 7 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, Ruiz-Mesa et al reported a statistically significant worse visual acuity with EDOF IOLs than MIOLs at preferred reading distances, but the testing methods and luminance were not described in the study [ 35 ]. In in vitro experiments, the EDOF technique shows a satisfying tolerance to the presence of astigmatism and decentration [ 43 , 45 ]. Overall, the worse near vision did not seem to affect patient satisfaction, which was high for both EDOF IOLs and TIOLs.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Comparison of Patient Outcomes following Implantation of Trifocal and Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Guo

Wang

Hao

et al. 2021

Journal of Ophthalmology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose. The purpose is to compare the outcomes of implantation of trifocal intraocular lenses (TIOLs) and extended depth of focus (EDOF) intraocular lenses (IOLs). Methods. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrial.gov was conducted in March 2020 to identify relevant studies. A meta-analysis of the results was performed. Patients implanted with EDOF IOLs or TIOLs in previous studies were included. The primary outcomes of the study were uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA), uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA), and defocus curve. Results. TIOLs and EDOF IOLs provided comparable binocular UDVA (MD = -0.01, 95% CI: -0.04, 0.03, logMAR). However, EDOF IOLs provided better UIVA (MD: -0.08, 95% CI: -0.14, -0.01, logMAR) and worse UNVA (MD: 0.10, 95% CI: 0.06, 0.14, logMAR) than TIOLs. Fewer patients achieved spectacle independence after implantation of EDOF IOLs (RR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.63, 0.87) than after implantation of TIOLs, especially for near vision (RR = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.68, 0.99). There was no statistically significant difference in contrast sensitivity (CS) under photopic or mesopic conditions with both IOLs. Patient satisfaction after implantation of both IOLs was high. Conclusion. EDOF IOLs and TIOLs provide comparable distance vision. However, EDOF IOLs provide better intermediate vision and worse near vision than TIOLs. The advantages of EDOF IOLs over TIOLs in terms of CS, aberrations, and visual disturbance are not significant. Patients are satisfied with both types of IOLs.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of Patient Outcomes following Implantation of Trifocal and Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Guo

Wang

Hao

et al. 2021

Journal of Ophthalmology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The EDoF IOL performs better than other multifocal IOLs when IOL power calculation is di cult, with su cient con dence, such as when calculating IOL power in post refractive patients 58 . Ben et al used an optical bench based on the Lobb eye model to compare EDoF IOLs with conventional bifocal IOLs (AcrySof ReSTOR SA60D3, Alcon Laboratories Inc.) and found that EDOFs main advantage was increased tolerance to decentration and astigmatism 59 . In a retrospective study by Torun-Acar et al, patients implanted with a trifocal IOL combined with EDoF technology were found to have high satisfaction, good contrast sensitivity, and signi cant improvement in overall vison 56 .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bibliometric and visual analysis of global research on premium IOLs from 2000 to 2022

Liu

et al. 2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Premium intraocular lenses (PIOLs), particularly those using multifocal, extended depth of focus (EDoF) and toric technologies, have been in clinical use for decades, giving countless cataract patients the ability to see the world clearly again. To explore the development process, research status and future development trends of PIOLs, we explored research on PIOLs from the past 22 years through bibliometrics. Methods The literature search was performed on the Web of Science and included PIOL studies published between 2000 and November 2022. The retrieved literature was collated and analyzed by R-tool's Bibliometrix package, CitNetExplorer, CiteSpace and other software. Results We obtained a total of 1801 articles about PIOLs, most of which were published in Spain and the United States. The organization that published the most articles was the University of Valencia in Spain. Alió JL, and Montés-Micó R, from Spain were the most influential authors in this field. The Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery and Journal of Refractive Surgery were the core journals for this field; the top 10 cited articles mainly focus on postoperative satisfaction with multifocal IOLs and postoperative results of toric IOLs. Through a key word analysis, we found that trifocal IOLs, astigmatism and EDoF IOLs are the most discussed topics at present, and the importance of astigmatism and the clinical application of the new generation of PIOL are the emerging research trends. In addition, we found that researchers are not only focusing on the application of cutting-edge technology but also paying increasing attention to patients' subjective satisfaction. Conclusion Bibliometric analysis can effectively help to identify multilevel concerns in premium intraocular lens (PIOL) research and we found that in the past 2 decades, the research of PIOL has made rapid development and gradually matured, countless cataract patients can regain excellent visual quality and improve their quality of life after surgery. The current research hotspots regarding PIOL are the application of EDoF IOL as well as trifocal IOL and its toric models and the development of new types of PIOLs.

show abstract

“…The solution presented in this paper produces continuously focused vision over the full required range that in regular eye is covered by accommodation of 3.00D (from near range of 33cm and up to infinity) [11][12][13]. All this is obtained with static element with high energetic efficiency and without any need of applying force by the mussels of the eye.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 95%

Clinical trials of interference-based extended depth of focus intra ocular lens design

et al. 2015

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Intraocular Omni-focal Lens With Increased Tolerance to Decentration and Astigmatism

Cited by 19 publications

References 10 publications

Comparison of Patient Outcomes following Implantation of Trifocal and Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Comparison of Patient Outcomes following Implantation of Trifocal and Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Bibliometric and visual analysis of global research on premium IOLs from 2000 to 2022

Clinical trials of interference-based extended depth of focus intra ocular lens design

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About