2020
DOI: 10.3390/vaccines8010102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intramuscular Immunization with Chemokine-Adjuvanted Inactive Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus Induces Substantial Protection in Pigs

Abstract: Intramuscular (IM) immunization is generally considered incapable of generating a protective mucosal immune response. In the swine industry, attempts to develop a safe and protective vaccine for controlling porcine epidemic diarrhea (PED) via an IM route of administration have been unsuccessful. In the present study, porcine chemokine ligand proteins CCL25, 27, and 28 were constructed and stably expressed in the mammalian expression system. IM co-administration of inactivated PEDV (iPEDV) particles with differ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, a milder clinical sign was also observed in pigs of the VLP+CCL group as compared to the VLP group. However, when compared to the animals immunized using the inactivated virus formulated with CCL25/28 in a previous study [ 46 ], pigs in the VLP+CCL group showed relatively less protection against the PEDV challenge. It might be due to the PEDV exposure age at 11 weeks old and failure to elicit the optimal immune response, as it can be observed that the mean PEDV S-specific IgG titers were relatively low, with mean S/P ratios of around 0.4 and 0.7 in the VLP and VLP-CCL groups, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, a milder clinical sign was also observed in pigs of the VLP+CCL group as compared to the VLP group. However, when compared to the animals immunized using the inactivated virus formulated with CCL25/28 in a previous study [ 46 ], pigs in the VLP+CCL group showed relatively less protection against the PEDV challenge. It might be due to the PEDV exposure age at 11 weeks old and failure to elicit the optimal immune response, as it can be observed that the mean PEDV S-specific IgG titers were relatively low, with mean S/P ratios of around 0.4 and 0.7 in the VLP and VLP-CCL groups, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…In this study, PEDV VLPs were generated and characterized for developing a safe and potent immunogen against highly virulent strains in pigs. To induce effective protection via a convenient parenteral route, we incorporated CCL25 and CCL28, which have been shown to be effective in our previous study [ 46 ], as mucosal adjuvants in this strategy. Our results demonstrated that the regimen is capable of eliciting not only systemic PEDV S-specific IgG and IFN-γ-producing cells in PBMCs but also mucosal PEDV S-specific IgA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations