2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109646
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intramolecular quality control: HIV-1 envelope gp160 signal-peptide cleavage as a functional folding checkpoint

Abstract: Highlights d Intramolecular quality control via two post-targeting roles of gp120 signal peptide d Assembly of N and C termini of HIV-1 gp120 triggers signalpeptide cleavage d Redox-active signal-peptide cysteine sustains conformational plasticity

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 105 publications
(153 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This difference is underlined by the distinct limiting factors of membrane trimers (i.e., expression) versus SOSIPs (i.e., "closed" trimers), which is reflected in the fact that different strains make better prototypes e.g., JR-FL and BG505, respectively. The fact that codon optimization, modified signal peptides [ 118 ], different expression plasmids and lentiviral vectors were unhelpful—all suggest that the expression bottleneck is not at the level of transcription, but relates to protein folding. Various domain swaps were also unhelpful, perhaps because, unlike rigidified SOSIP, native trimers are flexible, increasing the possibility that engraftments can perturb quaternary folding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This difference is underlined by the distinct limiting factors of membrane trimers (i.e., expression) versus SOSIPs (i.e., "closed" trimers), which is reflected in the fact that different strains make better prototypes e.g., JR-FL and BG505, respectively. The fact that codon optimization, modified signal peptides [ 118 ], different expression plasmids and lentiviral vectors were unhelpful—all suggest that the expression bottleneck is not at the level of transcription, but relates to protein folding. Various domain swaps were also unhelpful, perhaps because, unlike rigidified SOSIP, native trimers are flexible, increasing the possibility that engraftments can perturb quaternary folding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Env SP is cleaved off by cellular signal peptidases. Beyond functionality in trafficking and its role as an insertion signal, specific timing of cleavage of the SP may also act as a quality control for properly folded Envs [ 87 ]. The addition of cleavable signal peptides has also been shown to enhance packaging efficiency of pseudotyped viral particles [ 88 ].…”
Section: Hallmark Features Of Gamma-type Envsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The general paradigm is that an N-terminal signal peptide (SP) directs their co-translational translocation into the endoplasmic reticulum, where they fold and oligomerize into trimers that remain membrane-anchored via a C-terminal transmembrane (TM) segment. The membrane-inserted SP is cleaved by a host signalase [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The general paradigm is that an N-terminal signal peptide (SP) directs their co-translational translocation into the endoplasmic reticulum, where they fold and oligomerize into trimers that remain membrane-anchored via a C-terminal transmembrane (TM) segment. The membrane-inserted SP is cleaved by a host signalase [12]. The protomers are further proteolyzed by an additional host protease to generate two subunits, an N-terminal, peripheral subunit (N-SU), which recognizes a cellular receptor or attachment factor, and a C-terminal, viral membrane anchored subunit (C-SU), which is maintained in a metastable, energy loaded state within the primed trimer [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%