1995
DOI: 10.1021/j100013a007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intramolecular Interactions in the Ground and Excited States of Tetrakis(N-methylpyridyl)porphyrins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

18
168
2
4

Year Published

2000
2000
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 178 publications
(192 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
18
168
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The estimated values of the dimerization constants are presented in Table 1. The range of the dimerization constants is the same to that known from the literature for water solution [35,36]. Values of the dimerization constants from Table 1 are insignificantly decreasing along with the time of monolith samples drying.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…The estimated values of the dimerization constants are presented in Table 1. The range of the dimerization constants is the same to that known from the literature for water solution [35,36]. Values of the dimerization constants from Table 1 are insignificantly decreasing along with the time of monolith samples drying.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…However, in our experimental results, we did not observe any significant dependence of st on f. The changes in the TMPyP absorption and fluorescence spectra due to variations of the solvent polarity could be associated with charge transfer (CT) between the porphyrin core and lateral groups, which contributes to the formation of their lowest absorption maximum [32][33][34]. However, when CT transitions do occur at the change of the environment polarity, the absorption and fluorescence spectra appear significantly shifted [35] while in our experiments we have observed just a weak effect of solvent polarity on the TMPyP spectra.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 56%
“…The intersystem crossing and internal conversion quantum yields were calculated as ϕ isc = S 1 / isc and ϕ ic = 1 − (ϕ isc + ϕ F ), respectively. We have observed a reduction of the 34 value and an increase of isc and ic in organic and micellar solutions, as compared with aqueous ones, while both ϕ isc and ϕ ic remained practically unchanged.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 67%
See 2 more Smart Citations