2015
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m114.624395
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intramembrane Aromatic Interactions Influence the Lipid Sensitivities of Pentameric Ligand-gated Ion Channels

Abstract: Background: Channel gating is uncoupled from agonist binding when nicotinic receptors lack activating lipids. Results: Gating is also uncoupled with ELIC, but engineered aromatic interactions at the M4-M1/M3 interface restore coupling. Conclusion:The strength of M4-M1/M3 interactions impacts both coupling and lipid sensitivity. Significance: Variable levels of intramembrane aromatics in eukaryotic homologs likely lead to variable lipid sensitivities.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
47
2
Order By: Relevance
“…ELIC, with no aromatic interactions in the C-terminal half of M4 exhibits weak M4-M1/M3 interactions in this region. ELIC is more sensitive than GLIC to M4 targeting modulators, such as the CMS mutation and lipids, although aromatic substitutions at the M4-M1/M3 abrogates sensitivity to both (Carswell et al, 2015). The nAChR with relatively few inter-α-helix aromatic interactions, likely exhibits relatively weak M4-M1/M3 interactions along the entire length of M4, and is even more sensitive than ELIC to both the CMS mutation and lipids.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ELIC, with no aromatic interactions in the C-terminal half of M4 exhibits weak M4-M1/M3 interactions in this region. ELIC is more sensitive than GLIC to M4 targeting modulators, such as the CMS mutation and lipids, although aromatic substitutions at the M4-M1/M3 abrogates sensitivity to both (Carswell et al, 2015). The nAChR with relatively few inter-α-helix aromatic interactions, likely exhibits relatively weak M4-M1/M3 interactions along the entire length of M4, and is even more sensitive than ELIC to both the CMS mutation and lipids.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the same PC membranes, ELIC does not gate open in response to agonist binding. An ELIC mutant with engineering aromatic interactions at the M4eM1/M3 interface to tighten M4 binding, however, retains channel activity in these minimal PC membranes (Carswell et al, 2014). Aromatic interactions at this interface, which strengthen the apparent binding of M4 to M1/M3, thus appear to play a role in the sensitivity of these prokaryotic pLGICs to their surrounding membrane.…”
Section: Interhelical Chemistry and The Sensitivity Of Plgics To Potementioning
confidence: 97%
“…This lack of function may be due to the absence of effective post-M4 aromatic interactions. Significantly, engineering the post-M4 aromatic cluster into ELIC restores the ability of ELIC to gate open in PC bilayers [128]. Modulatable post-M4-M1/M3 interactions thus play a role in ELIC lipid-sensing.…”
Section: Testing the Role Of M4 In Plgic Lipid-sensingmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Protocols for reconstituting GLIC and ELIC into lipid bilayers have been developed [124][125][126][127][128]. As noted, the extensive aromatic network at the M4-M1/M3 interface in GLIC contributes to relatively strong M4-M1/M3 interactions along the entire length of M4.…”
Section: Testing the Role Of M4 In Plgic Lipid-sensingmentioning
confidence: 98%