2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.09.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intramedullary tibial nailing using infrapatellar and suprapatellar approaches: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
16
0
9

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
3
16
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, there was a small trend toward superior outcomes in the IP group, when evaluated by outcome measures other than the Lysholm Knee Score; however, this comparison was not statistically significant. These findings are consistent with the analysis performed by Packer et al, 31 who reported that the significant difference in Lysholm outcome scores was similarly not reproduced when using other knee outcome measures.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In fact, there was a small trend toward superior outcomes in the IP group, when evaluated by outcome measures other than the Lysholm Knee Score; however, this comparison was not statistically significant. These findings are consistent with the analysis performed by Packer et al, 31 who reported that the significant difference in Lysholm outcome scores was similarly not reproduced when using other knee outcome measures.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In addition, the review by Wang et al 30 included 2 manuscripts, which were only published in the Chinese language and 1 study which only reported on intraoperative outcomes, without any postoperative follow-up data on patient outcomes. Although Packer et al 31 more recently performed a meta-analysis assessing all published outcome measures, 3 recent studies presenting PROMs comparing SP and IP tibial IMN, all published in 2020, were not included in that review.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From our study, we have been able to establish a shorter patient positioning time, with potentially shorter operative time and reduced TRD for SP tibial nail fixations. Several large studies including systematic reviews and meta-analyses demonstrate the superiority of the SP approach for tibial intramedullary nailing in comparison to the IP approach, an opinion we indeed share and corroborate with, in this study [18][19][20].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Although risks have been hypothesized, a few cadaveric and clinical studies have been conducted and established the limitations and consequences of the suprapatellar approach to IMN [ 4 , 7 ]. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses demonstrated significant reduction in total blood loss, post-operative knee pain, reduction in fluoroscopy exposure, and improvement in knee scores [ 8 ]. Although there seemed to be no significant differences in pain, disability, or knee range of motion, a few cases documented articular changes and evidence of chondromalacia on MRI [ 5 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The clinical outcomes of the suprapatellar approach have been evaluated in the recently published systematic review and meta-analysis [ 8 ]. To the best of our knowledge, only one clinical study of suprapatellar IMN has attempted to evaluate the clinical outcomes of suprapatellar IMN.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%