1976
DOI: 10.1097/00003086-197601000-00033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intramedullary Nailing of Femoral Shaft Fractures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The average time to union in nailing group of 16.43 ± 2.48 weeks reported by Shrestha et al [12] and 16.5 weeks reported by Deepak et al [16] also agree with the findings of this study. The overall bone union rate of 100% noted in the intramedullary nailing group in the study also agrees with the already documented rate of 97% to 100% following locked intramedullary nailing in most series [16,17]. Similarly, the time of Table 5 shows that all the fractures in the locked intramedullary nailing group had bridging callus in at least three cortices in the fracture site at 12 weeks while only 22 (84.6%) of fractures in the plating group showed similar effect between 12 and 18 weeks.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The average time to union in nailing group of 16.43 ± 2.48 weeks reported by Shrestha et al [12] and 16.5 weeks reported by Deepak et al [16] also agree with the findings of this study. The overall bone union rate of 100% noted in the intramedullary nailing group in the study also agrees with the already documented rate of 97% to 100% following locked intramedullary nailing in most series [16,17]. Similarly, the time of Table 5 shows that all the fractures in the locked intramedullary nailing group had bridging callus in at least three cortices in the fracture site at 12 weeks while only 22 (84.6%) of fractures in the plating group showed similar effect between 12 and 18 weeks.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This was similar to the average time of bone union of femoral shaft fractures following internal fixation reported by Salminen in his study [26]. The overall bone union rate of 92.3% found in the study at 18 weeks also agrees with the overall rate of 90% -100% reported by Magerl et al [22] and Warmbrod et al [27] in their series.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Nonetheless, because it requires no special equipment and achieves quick stabilization, some authors advocate open nailing for polytrauma patients. [ 20 23 24 ] The technique is also particularly useful in resource-poor environments because it requires less training and minimally expensive equipment. Liao et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 19 20 21 22 ] On the other hand, open reduction has the advantages of being easily learned, producing better reduction and having shorter operation times. [ 23 24 ] Kimmatker et al . also showed a significantly higher rate of rotational deformity following closed reduction of femoral shaft fractures as compared with open nailing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%