2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.10.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intramedullary medial column support with the Midfoot Fusion Bolt (MFB) is not sufficient for osseous healing of arthrodesis in neuroosteoarthropathic feet

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
24
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
24
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Even with a slight dislocation of the MFB in the medial and/or lateral column, no signification loss of correction was observed. Addressing single foot columns with the MFB as a stand-alone implant leads to a high rate of complications and recurrent instability [37]. The initial instruction manual of the MFB system stated that a ''stand alone'' use of MFB is not recommended.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Even with a slight dislocation of the MFB in the medial and/or lateral column, no signification loss of correction was observed. Addressing single foot columns with the MFB as a stand-alone implant leads to a high rate of complications and recurrent instability [37]. The initial instruction manual of the MFB system stated that a ''stand alone'' use of MFB is not recommended.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…without any further implants of any kind (MFB or other). So, the use of two or three MFB as recommended in the manuscript would not be ''stand alone'' [37].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Three groups have reported a total of 19 feet in 19 patients using this implant at a mean follow-up of 18.5, 27 and 24 months, respectively. 4,14,26 Wiewiorski et al 4 reported eight feet with a mean Meary angle pre-operatively of 15º ,compared with 26º in our series, with four having concomitant ulceration at the time of surgery, compared with nine of ten in our series. 4 Cullen et al 14 However, in all feet, including our series, no incidence of implant bending or breakage was encountered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 39%
“…4 Cullen et al 14 However, in all feet, including our series, no incidence of implant bending or breakage was encountered. 4,14,26 We used the Midfoot Fusion Bolt to enable intramedullary fusion with a lower implant failure rate than 6% as reported by Grant et al with fixation using a cannulated screw. 27 The bolt is specifically designed for midfoot fusion in patients with CN.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%