1999
DOI: 10.1097/00004728-199909000-00004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intrahepatic Peripheral Cholangiocarcinoma: Comparison of Dynamic CT and Dynamic MRI

Abstract: Both D-CT and D-MRI can provide important information for the diagnosis of PCC. D-CT is better than D-MRI for demonstrating vascular involvement and extrahepatic invasion. D-MRI gives more conspicuous enhancement.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

8
59
1
10

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
8
59
1
10
Order By: Relevance
“…MRCP may have some potential advantages over CT in identifying intrahepatic mass lesions, and can provide a three-dimensional computerized reconstruction of the biliary tree allowing assessment of bile ducts both above and below a stricture. The non-invasively acquired cholangiographic images obtained by MRCP are comparable with invasive cholangiographies (ERCP and PTC), high positive and negative predictive values for detecting the level and features of biliary obstructions [61,[66][67][68] . Owing to its intrinsically high tissue contrast and multiplanar capability, MRCP is superior to ERCP for defining the anatomy of tumor and assessing its respectability.…”
Section: Evaluation Modalitiesmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…MRCP may have some potential advantages over CT in identifying intrahepatic mass lesions, and can provide a three-dimensional computerized reconstruction of the biliary tree allowing assessment of bile ducts both above and below a stricture. The non-invasively acquired cholangiographic images obtained by MRCP are comparable with invasive cholangiographies (ERCP and PTC), high positive and negative predictive values for detecting the level and features of biliary obstructions [61,[66][67][68] . Owing to its intrinsically high tissue contrast and multiplanar capability, MRCP is superior to ERCP for defining the anatomy of tumor and assessing its respectability.…”
Section: Evaluation Modalitiesmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…However, CT can only establish the resectability in 60% of cases [61] , and cannot usually define the extent of cholangiocar-cinoma because of the sclerosis and fibrosis of surrounding tissue. In addition, CT cannot accurately differentiate ICC from PSC [62] .…”
Section: Evaluation Modalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, innovative methods for CT image reconstruction, including multiplanar reconstruction and three-dimensional images, were recently introduced for the visualization of biliary structures [7] . CT angiography has been demonstrated to be useful for the detection and assessment of vascular encasement [8][9][10] .…”
Section: Computed Tomography (Ct)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although computed tomography provides better anatomical detail (e.g., by depicting vascular or extrahepatic invasion) and more accurate staging (118), magnetic resonance imaging allows greater contrast which facilitates detection of the tumor and evaluation of hepatic parenchymal changes peripheral to the tumor. However, the two modalities are equally effective at detecting and correctly diagnosing the tumor (32).…”
Section: Imaging Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%