2020
DOI: 10.1177/0894486519899573
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intrafamily Conflicts in Family Businesses: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Agenda for Future Research

Abstract: Through a systematic literature review, we assess the current state of research on intrafamily conflicts in family firms, systematize the findings, and outline avenues for future research. Based on a review of 88 studies, we develop an input–process–output framework to synthesize input, process, output, and context variables and identify research gaps. The review contributes to the family business literature by bridging the family business and intragroup conflict literature, considering multiple levels of anal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
40
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 124 publications
1
40
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…With regard to theories, the reviewed articles draw on a variety of approaches. This is consistent with the finding of other reviews on family businesses (Kubíček & Machek, 2020). The dominant and common theoretical framework for the capital structure decision includes two traditional theories "the trade-off theory" and "the pecking order theory".…”
Section: Theoretical Perspectivessupporting
confidence: 89%
“…With regard to theories, the reviewed articles draw on a variety of approaches. This is consistent with the finding of other reviews on family businesses (Kubíček & Machek, 2020). The dominant and common theoretical framework for the capital structure decision includes two traditional theories "the trade-off theory" and "the pecking order theory".…”
Section: Theoretical Perspectivessupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Cohesive social networks, characterized by higher bonding social capital, are expected to experience less interpersonal conflicts (Cao et al, 2013). It can hence be assumed that family firms with strong preference for SEW will display greater levels of quality of relationships, family harmony and shared values, which are known to inhibit conflicts among family members (Kubíček & Machek, 2020).…”
Section: Consequences Of Socioemotional Wealth Importancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…November 12-13, 2020, Olomouc, Czech Republic (KNOWCON 2020) _____________________________________________________________________________ Family businesses represent a fertile environment for relationship conflicts, which may be very costly. In the family business literature, these conflicts are generally perceived as a negative phenomenon (Kubíček & Machek, 2020), and consequently, many authors find negative performance effects of family conflicts on firm performance (Eddleston & Kellermanns, 2007;Nosé et al, 2017). The main reasons include the reduction of mutual understanding, increased animosity and hostile behaviours (Eddleston & Kellermanns, 2007).…”
Section: Consequences Of Family Conflictmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations