1995
DOI: 10.1016/s1079-2104(05)80201-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intraexaminer and interexaminer reliability in the diagnosis of oral epithelial dysplasia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
211
1
4

Year Published

1998
1998
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 284 publications
(219 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
3
211
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The transformation rate is dependent on the severity of the dysplasia, which needs to be carefully assessed to determine the risk of malignancy. Some studies have shown that presence of Oral Epithelial Dysplasia (OED) in OPML as the most reliable factors predicting malignant transformation (Abbey et al, 1995). But there are other studies contradicting the presence of epithelial dysplasia in the biopsy not being a significant factor for malignant development (Holmstrup et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transformation rate is dependent on the severity of the dysplasia, which needs to be carefully assessed to determine the risk of malignancy. Some studies have shown that presence of Oral Epithelial Dysplasia (OED) in OPML as the most reliable factors predicting malignant transformation (Abbey et al, 1995). But there are other studies contradicting the presence of epithelial dysplasia in the biopsy not being a significant factor for malignant development (Holmstrup et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional grading system: mild dysplasia, moderate dysplasia, severe dysplasia and carcinoma in situ. [18,19] 3. Ljubljana grading system: simple hyperplasia, abnormal hyperplasia, atypical hyperplasia, carcinoma in situ.…”
Section: Etiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Se incluyeron lesiones orales de características clínicas diversas, localizadas en varias regiones de la mucosa oral, 298 de las que eran Clase I de Sciubba y la mayoría (n=647) Clase II. Esto lo que está de acuerdo con los datos publicados en la literatura, ya que estas son las lesiones más prevalentes en poblaciones con estas características demográficas (19,23). Para el cálculo de las medidas de validez de la prueba se utilizó los datos de todas las lesiones de Clase I y II sometidas a ambos procedimientos diagnósticos, comparando los resultados de forma independiente.…”
Section: Biopsia Por Cepillado Con El Oralcdx ® : Estudios Clínicosunclassified