Intradialytic Resistance Training Improves Functional Capacity and Lean Mass Gain in Individuals on Hemodialysis: A Randomized Pilot Trial

Lopes, Lorena Cristina Curado; Mota, João Felipe; Prestes, Jonato; Schincaglia, Raquel Machado; Silva, Debora Mendes; Queiroz, Nayara Pedatella; Freitas, Ana Tereza Vaz de Souza; Lira, Fábio Santos; Peixoto, Maria do Rosário Gondim

doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2019.06.006

Cited by 43 publications

(79 citation statements)

References 33 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Similar outcomes recorded by Marinho et al [ 60 ], where resistance exercise led to increased LBM compared to the initial measurement, but the increase was smaller in the intervention group compared to the controls (~1% versus 3%) [ 60 ]. On the contrary, in the studies by Chen et al [ 51 ], Lopes et al [ 59 ], and Rosa et al [ 62 ], LBM increased after the intervention, while in the non-physically active subjects, LBM decreased or showed a slighter increase [ 51 , 59 , 62 ]. Similarly, in the Song et al [ 64 ] study, an increase in the skeletal body mass was observed in the intervention group compared to the non-active group in which the skeletal body mass decreased [ 64 ].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The effect of exercise on the percentage of body fat (%BF) seemed to vary among the studies included in this systematic review, an effect that can be partially attributed to the type of exercise performed [ 51 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 64 ]. The results regarding %BF can be found in Table 4 .…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Similarly, in the Chen et al [ 51 ] and Song et al [ 64 ] studies, resistance exercise led to decrease in %BF in the active group in comparison to the control group in which an increase in %BF was observed [ 51 , 64 ]. Furthermore, in the study by Loppes et al [ 59 ], the exercise intervention did not significantly affect %BF in the group following a high-intensity program, while in the group of moderate intensity, the reduction was slightly higher than the control group [ 59 ]. In the Groussard et al [ 55 ] study, the low intensity of the resistance exercise did not have a statistical significant effect on %BF [ 55 ].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Two studies included in this systematic review examined changes in SMI, and both of them concluded that there was a significant improvement in SMI in the intervention group [ 59 , 65 ]. Resistance training with high-load led to a greater increase in SMI compared to the moderate-load group [ 59 ]. Moreover, in the aerobic exercise groups, the increase in SMI was greater than in the combined aerobic-resistance exercise group (0.15 versus 0.04, p < 0.05) [ 65 ].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Incomplete studies, studies with different control groups, studies not in the English language, or published before 2000 were excluded. As a result, 18 RCT studies [ 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 ] were characterized as acceptable; details regarding the eligibility process can be found in the flow diagram presented in Figure 1 .…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

The Effect of Exercise on Nutritional Status and Body Composition in Hemodialysis: A Systematic Review

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with aggravating factors which can affect both body composition and nutritional status. The purpose of the present systematic review was to investigate the potential effects of any physical activity on body composition or nutritional status among patients with stage 5 CKD undergoing hemodialysis (HD). A literature search on PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Cochrane was conducted and 14 randomized clinical trials were included. Skeletal muscle index and mid-arm muscular circumference increased after resistance exercise, and the results on body mass index, % body fat, and lean body mass varied. Serum albumin and C-reactive protein, in most cases, showed a slight increase and decrease, respectively. An improvement was also observed in body strength and overall performance status. The results suggest that physical activity can be beneficial for both the body composition and nutritional status of patients undergoing HD and can help in the prevention of sarcopenia. However, further research is needed mainly in the field of nutritional status.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

The Effect of Exercise on Nutritional Status and Body Composition in Hemodialysis: A Systematic Review

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Exercise training for adults undergoing maintenance dialysis

Bernier-Jean

Beruni

Bondonno

et al. 2022

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Effect of resistance training on chronic inflammation: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Rose

Mielke

Durr

et al. 2021

Translational Sports Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives To determine the pooled effect of resistance training compared with a control, on chronic inflammation in adults through systematic review and meta‐analysis (osf.io/xastp). Methods Intervention trials that assessed resistance training versus control, on peripheral, chronic pro‐inflammatory markers [C‐reactive protein (CRP), interleukin (IL)‐6, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)‐α] in adults were included, from four databases. Random‐effect meta‐analyses were conducted to calculate standardized mean differences (SMD) in post‐intervention values between groups. Meta‐regression explored the influence of age, chronic disease, body mass index, progressive resistance training (PRT), and intervention intensity, volume, duration, and “optimal prescription” on the pooled effect. Results Of 3,186 studies identified, 59 were included. Resistance training reduced CRP (SMD = −0.28; 95% CI = −0.46, −0.10), but not IL‐6 (SMD = −0.12; 95% CI = −0.31, 0.07) or TNF‐α (SMD = −0.07; 95% CI = −0.31, 0.16). Some heterogeneity was explained by interventions of lower intensity (<75% 1RM; 11.47%) or volume between 201 and 300 reps (6.14%). Conclusion Resistance training instigates small but significant reductions in CRP, but not IL‐6 or TNF‐α. Reductions in inflammation caused by resistance training may be influenced by intensity and volume, warranting further investigation. Resistance training should be implemented for chronic disease prevention or reduced progression, given pooled reductions in CRP.

show abstract

Intradialytic Resistance Training Improves Functional Capacity and Lean Mass Gain in Individuals on Hemodialysis: A Randomized Pilot Trial

Cited by 43 publications

References 33 publications

The Effect of Exercise on Nutritional Status and Body Composition in Hemodialysis: A Systematic Review

The Effect of Exercise on Nutritional Status and Body Composition in Hemodialysis: A Systematic Review

Exercise training for adults undergoing maintenance dialysis

Effect of resistance training on chronic inflammation: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About