1998
DOI: 10.1097/00001665-199805000-00010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intracranial Volume in Craniosynostotic Rabbits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

6
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…11,14,19 -24 This premise is supported by a number of studies using indirect intracranial volume measures from computed tomographic scans, which have shown significantly reduced preoperative intracranial volume in patients with craniosynostosis compared with control data. 15,16,25 However, a number of these studies were confounded, in part, by (1) differing techniques of computed tomographic volumetry; (2) heterogeneous or small samples; (3) variable surgical intervention times, procedures, or computed tomographic scan protocols; and (4) the use of inappropriate normative control data 17,18,26,27 ; thus, the relationship between intracranial volume and premature suture fusion still remains unclear.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…11,14,19 -24 This premise is supported by a number of studies using indirect intracranial volume measures from computed tomographic scans, which have shown significantly reduced preoperative intracranial volume in patients with craniosynostosis compared with control data. 15,16,25 However, a number of these studies were confounded, in part, by (1) differing techniques of computed tomographic volumetry; (2) heterogeneous or small samples; (3) variable surgical intervention times, procedures, or computed tomographic scan protocols; and (4) the use of inappropriate normative control data 17,18,26,27 ; thus, the relationship between intracranial volume and premature suture fusion still remains unclear.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To study this relationship, and to address some of the discrepancies and confounding variables noted in previous reports, 17,18,26,27 a series of experimental studies were undertaken in our laboratory to assess age-related intracranial volume changes from three-dimensional, computed tomographic scan reconstructions in a large, homogeneous sample of rabbits with uncorrected, familial coronal suture synostosis and compare them with age-matched, normal control rabbits. In October of 1997, we reported intracranial volume data from 56 wild-type rabbits and rabbits with delayed-or early-onset coronal suture synostosis at 42 and 126 days of age.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Premature coronal suture synostosis is associated with secondary deformities in the cranial vault and cranial base (Babler and Persing, 1982;Vannier, 1985, 1986;Burdi et al, 1986;Babler, 1989;Hoyte, 1989;Mooney et al, 1994b;Burrows et al, 1995;Smith et al, 1996), significantly elevated intracranial pressure (Renier, 1989;Gault et al, 1992;Mooney et al, 1998aMooney et al, , 1999Fellows-Mayle et al, 2000), and altered intracranial volume (Singhal et al, 1997;Hudgins et al, 1998;Mooney et al, 1998a,b;Camfield et al, 2000). These conditions may result in optic nerve compression and papilledema, and, if left uncorrected, optic atrophy, blindness (Miller, 2000), cognitive disabilities, and mental retardation (Kapp-Simmonds et al, 1993;Arnaud et al, 1995;Camfield et al, 2000;Persing and Jane, 2000).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surprisingly, intracranial pressure data do not follow this trend, suggesting that compensatory changes in brain morphology occur between 25 and 42 days of age. By 42 days of age, significant compensatory growth changes have been noted in the cranial vault 17,24,26,38,39 and cranial base 17,24,30 of rabbits with early-onset coronal suture synostosis compared with normal control rabbits. This may explain the decrease in intracranial pressure by 42 days of age.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%