1969
DOI: 10.3758/bf03336250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intracranial reinforcement: Performance decrements as a function of stimulus parameters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

1972
1972
1974
1974

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With these Ss, then, the primary determinant of responsiveness to ICS remains that portion of the variance attributable to a S factor, which in turn is most likel~ related to variations in exact stimulation. This conclusion of the overwhelming importance of exact stimulation to the determination of exact responsiveness for ICS is the same conelusion that other data have indicated (e.g., West et al, 1971;Westcott, Reid, & Wasden, 1969).…”
supporting
confidence: 74%
“…With these Ss, then, the primary determinant of responsiveness to ICS remains that portion of the variance attributable to a S factor, which in turn is most likel~ related to variations in exact stimulation. This conclusion of the overwhelming importance of exact stimulation to the determination of exact responsiveness for ICS is the same conelusion that other data have indicated (e.g., West et al, 1971;Westcott, Reid, & Wasden, 1969).…”
supporting
confidence: 74%