2014
DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2014.00129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intracranial Angioplasty and Stenting before and after SAMMPRIS: “From Simple to Complex Strategy – The Chinese Experience”

Abstract: Intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) accounts for 33–50% of all ischemic strokes in the Asian population (1) and represents an important public health issue in China. The results of the SAMMPRIS trial alarmed most experienced interventionalists in China for two reasons. Firstly, the high complication rate in the stenting arm (20% the first year) was higher than expected. Secondly, the recurrent stroke rate in the aggressive medical treatment arm at 12.2% during the first year was unacceptably high, not … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…15 However, there have been controversies over the study; with improved patient and device selection and increased technical experience, intracranial stent placement still holds a promising role for selected patients. 8,20,21 The use of the Wingspan stent was not off-label in our center. Our choice of endovascular devices was based on lesion or vessel characteristics 8 ; hence, we advise caution against overinterpretation of our data because our study was not meant to compare the efficacy among different vascularization methods by using the Apollo, the Wingspan stent, or sole angioplasty.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 However, there have been controversies over the study; with improved patient and device selection and increased technical experience, intracranial stent placement still holds a promising role for selected patients. 8,20,21 The use of the Wingspan stent was not off-label in our center. Our choice of endovascular devices was based on lesion or vessel characteristics 8 ; hence, we advise caution against overinterpretation of our data because our study was not meant to compare the efficacy among different vascularization methods by using the Apollo, the Wingspan stent, or sole angioplasty.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 Nonetheless, the weight of these studies do not compare with that of randomized clinical trials. 17 A randomized clinical trial with careful selection of patients is thus warranted in the Chinese population such that these patients are not deprived of a potentially beneficial treatment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stenting can improve cerebral perfusion to alleviate ischemic symptoms and compress the plaque outside the stent to prevent the embolus from falling and causing cerebral infarction. However, endovascular interventions may cause periprocedural complications, such as wall dissection and occlusion of perforating branches 25. So accurate assessment of the artery stenotic histopathologic findings may help in the selection of suitable patients for interventional therapy and reduce the risk of periprocedural complications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%