1999
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/9.8.833
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intracortical Excitation of Spiny Neurons in Layer 4 of Cat Striate Cortex In Vitro

Abstract: Recordings were made from pairs of neurons in cat striate visual cortex in vitro to study the AMPA-channel-mediated components of intracortical excitatory synaptic connections between layer 4 spiny neurons and between layer 6 and layer 4 spiny neurons. Forty-six of the 72 cells recorded were identified morphologically. They consisted of spiny stellate and pyramidal cells in layer 4, and pyramidal cells in layer 6. Connections between layer 4 excitatory cells involve excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
78
2
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
12
78
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A total of 203 pyramidal cells (across 17 mice) recorded in the slice were identified in the in vivo image stacks, and the overall connection rate was 75/520 (0.14). Consistent with previous reports [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] , the distribution of excitatory postsynaptic potential (EPSP) amplitudes was highly skewed (median EPSP amplitude: 0.19 mV; mean EPSP amplitude ± s.d. : 0.45 ± 0.68 mV; Fig.…”
supporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A total of 203 pyramidal cells (across 17 mice) recorded in the slice were identified in the in vivo image stacks, and the overall connection rate was 75/520 (0.14). Consistent with previous reports [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] , the distribution of excitatory postsynaptic potential (EPSP) amplitudes was highly skewed (median EPSP amplitude: 0.19 mV; mean EPSP amplitude ± s.d. : 0.45 ± 0.68 mV; Fig.…”
supporting
confidence: 89%
“…Excitatory connection amplitudes between pairs of cortical neurons vary over two orders of magnitude, comprising only very few strong connections among many weaker ones [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] . Although this highly skewed distribution of connection strengths is observed in diverse cortical areas 1-9 , its functional significance remains unknown: it is not clear how connection strength relates to neuronal response properties, nor how strong and weak inputs contribute to information processing in local microcircuits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first mechanism could play a role if layer 4 circuits are more compact than SGr or IGr circuits. However, the responses we recorded receive a large contribution of local circuit activity from different sources (Tarczy-Hornoch et al, 1999;Martin, 2002;Schubert et al, 2003) making predictions about the electrotonic distribution of the input very difficult. The second mechanism is supported in part by the highly synchronized input from thalamus to layer 4 at the highest velocity (Pinto et al, 2000), which has a high efficacy (Gil et al, 1999).…”
Section: Differences In Synaptic and Spike Responses From Different Lmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In analogy to the visual cortex, spiny layer 4 neurons may also establish synaptic contacts with layer 6 pyramidal neurons and in turn may receive synapses from these neurons (Gilbert and Wiesel, 1979;Martin and Whitteridge, 1984;McGuire et al, 1984;Benshalom and White, 1986;Ahmed et al, 1994;Stratford et al, 1996;Tarczy-Hornoch et al, 1999). The axonal projection of spiny layer 4 neurons toward layer 6 makes it likely that such a feed-forward A functional cortical column is superimposed in light gray.…”
Section: Infragranular Layersmentioning
confidence: 99%