2016
DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2016.00291
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intracortical Brain-Machine Interfaces Advance Sensorimotor Neuroscience

Abstract: Brain-machine interfaces (BMIs) decode brain activity to control external devices. Over the past two decades, the BMI community has grown tremendously and reached some impressive milestones, including the first human clinical trials using chronically implanted intracortical electrodes. It has also contributed experimental paradigms and important findings to basic neuroscience. In this review, we discuss neuroscience achievements stemming from BMI research, specifically that based upon upper limb prosthetic con… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Subjects may imagine self-motion, others-motion, wrist movement, arm movement, or hand movement without specific instruction. In addition, the familiarity factor also affects MI-BCI performance, since MI-BCI performance significantly increases for fully fledged subjects (Schroeder and Chestek, 2016 ; Subramanian et al, 2016 ). However, AO-BCI, as a visually evoked stimulus, eliminates the uncertainties of spontaneous MI-BCI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subjects may imagine self-motion, others-motion, wrist movement, arm movement, or hand movement without specific instruction. In addition, the familiarity factor also affects MI-BCI performance, since MI-BCI performance significantly increases for fully fledged subjects (Schroeder and Chestek, 2016 ; Subramanian et al, 2016 ). However, AO-BCI, as a visually evoked stimulus, eliminates the uncertainties of spontaneous MI-BCI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, intracortical microelectrodes were used recently to allow patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) to use their thoughts to control virtual neural cursors on the computer screen (Gilja et al, 2015 ). Over the past two decades, brain computer interfaces involving intracortical microelectrodes have entered clinical trials for patients with motor deficits, such as spinal cord injuries and ALS (Gilja et al, 2015 ; Schroeder and Chestek, 2016 ; Ajiboye et al, 2017 ). Unfortunately, recording quality of microelectrodes decreases within weeks and diminishes within a few years due to the complex inflammatory response observed after electrode implantation (Chestek et al, 2011 ; Jorfi et al, 2014 ; Kozai et al, 2015 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first clinical use of neural electrode technology was in 1985, when the FDA approved the use of cochlear prosthetics ( Spelman, 1999 ). Since then, clinical implementation of IME has been employed to treat patients with numerous neurological diseases and injuries, such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and spinal cord injuries ( Gilja et al, 2015 ; Schroeder and Chestek, 2016 ; Ajiboye et al, 2017 ). Unfortunately, an impediment preventing the clinical deployment of IME technology is the complex inflammatory response occurring after electrode implantation, leading to decreased recording quality ( Chestek et al, 2011 ; Jorfi et al, 2014 ; Kozai et al, 2015 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%